On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:50:08PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:36:16PM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:51:41PM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:31:30PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > > > > > Currently intel_can_enable_sagv function contains
> > > > > > a mix of workarounds for different platforms
> > > > > > some of them are not valid for gens >= 11 already,
> > > > > > so lets split it into separate functions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v2:
> > > > > > - Rework watermark calculation algorithm to
> > > > > > attempt to calculate Level 0 watermark
> > > > > > with added sagv block time latency and
> > > > > > check if it fits in DBuf in order to
> > > > > > determine if SAGV can be enabled already
> > > > > > at this stage, just as BSpec 49325 states.
> > > > > > if that fails rollback to usual Level 0
> > > > > > latency and disable SAGV.
> > > > > > - Remove unneeded tabs(James Ausmus)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v3: Rebased the patch
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v4: - Added back interlaced check for Gen12 and
> > > > > > added separate function for TGL SAGV check
> > > > > > (thanks to James Ausmus for spotting)
> > > > > > - Removed unneeded gen check
> > > > > > - Extracted Gen12 SAGV decision making code
> > > > > > to a separate function from skl_compute_wm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v5: - Added SAGV global state to dev_priv, because
> > > > > > we need to track all pipes, not only those
> > > > > > in atomic state. Each pipe has now correspondent
> > > > > > bit mask reflecting, whether it can tolerate
> > > > > > SAGV or not(thanks to Ville Syrjala for suggestions).
> > > > > > - Now using active flag instead of enable in crc
> > > > > > usage check.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v6: - Fixed rebase conflicts
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v7: - kms_cursor_legacy seems to get broken because of multiple
> > > > > > memcpy
> > > > > > calls when copying level 0 water marks for enabled SAGV, to
> > > > > > fix this now simply using that field right away, without
> > > > > > copying,
> > > > > > for that introduced a new wm_level accessor which decides
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > wm_level to return based on SAGV state.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v8: - Protect crtc_sagv_mask same way as we do for other global
> > > > > > state
> > > > > > changes: i.e check if changes are needed, then grab all crtc
> > > > > > locks
> > > > > > to serialize the changes(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Add crtc_sagv_mask caching in order to avoid needless
> > > > > > recalculations
> > > > > > (Matthew Roper)
> > > > > > - Put back Gen12 SAGV switch in order to get it enabled in
> > > > > > separate
> > > > > > patch(Matthew Roper)
> > > > > > - Rename *_set_sagv_mask to *_compute_sagv_mask(Matthew Roper)
> > > > > > - Check if there are no active pipes in intel_can_enable_sagv
> > > > > > instead of platform specific functions(Matthew Roper), same
> > > > > > for intel_has_sagv check.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v9 - Switched to u8 for crtc_sagv_mask(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - crtc_sagv_mask now is pipe_sagv_mask(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Extracted sagv checking logic from
> > > > > > skl/icl/tgl_compute_sagv_mask
> > > > > > - Extracted skl_plane_wm_level function and passing latency to
> > > > > > separate patches(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Removed part of unneeded copy-paste from
> > > > > > tgl_check_pipe_fits_sagv_wm
> > > > > > (Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Now using simple assignment for sagv_wm0 as it contains only
> > > > > > pod types and no pointers(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Fixed intel_can_enable_sagv not to do double duty, now it only
> > > > > > check SAGV bits by ANDing those between local and global
> > > > > > state.
> > > > > > The SAGV masks are now computed after watermarks are
> > > > > > available,
> > > > > > in order to be able to figure out if ddb ranges are fitting
> > > > > > nicely.
> > > > > > (Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Now having uv_sagv_wm0 and sagv_wm0, otherwise we have wrong
> > > > > > logic
> > > > > > when using skl_plane_wm_level accessor, as we had previously
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > Gen11+ color plane and regular wm levels, so probably both
> > > > > > has to be recalculated with additional SAGV block time for
> > > > > > Level 0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v10: - Starting to use new global state for storing pipe_sagv_mask
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v11: - Fixed rebase conflict with recent drm-tip
> > > > > > - Check if we really need to recalculate SAGV mask, otherwise
> > > > > > bail out without making any changes.
> > > > > > - Use cached SAGV result, instead of recalculating it
> > > > > > everytime,
> > > > > > if bw_state hasn't changed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v12: - Removed WARN from intel_can_enable_sagv, in some of the
> > > > > > commits
> > > > > > if we don't recalculated watermarks, bw_state is not
> > > > > > recalculated,
> > > > > > thus leading to SAGV state not recalculated by the commit
> > > > > > state,
> > > > > > which is still calling intel_can_enable_sagv function. Fix
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > by just analyzing the current global bw_state object -
> > > > > > because
> > > > > > we simply have no other objects related to that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v13: - Rebased, fixed warnings regarding long lines
> > > > > > - Changed function call sites from intel_atomic_bw* to
> > > > > > intel_wb_* as was suggested.(Jani Nikula)
> > > > > > - Taken ddb_state_changed and bw_state_changed into use.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v14: - total_affected_planes is no longer needed to check for ddb
> > > > > > changes,
> > > > > > just as active_pipe_changes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v15: - Fixed stupid mistake with uninitialized crtc in
> > > > > > skl_compute_sagv_mask.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v16: - Convert pipe_sagv_mask to pipe_sagv_reject and now using
> > > > > > inverted
> > > > > > flag to indicate SAGV readiness for the pipe(Ville Syrjälä)
> > > > > > - Added return value to intel_compute_sagv_mask which call
> > > > > > intel_atomic_serialize_global_state in order to properly
> > > > > > propagate EDEADLCK to drm.
> > > > > > - Based on the discussion with Ville, removed
> > > > > > active_pipe_changes
> > > > > > check and also there seems to be no need for checking
> > > > > > ddb_state_changes
> > > > > > as well. Instead we just iterate through crtcs in state -
> > > > > > having
> > > > > > crtc in a state already guarantees that it is at least
> > > > > > read-locked
> > > > > > Having additional flag to check if there actually were some
> > > > > > plane
> > > > > > wm/ddb changes would be probably added later as an
> > > > > > optimization.
> > > > > > - We can't get parent atomic state from crtc_state at commit
> > > > > > stage
> > > > > > (nice drm feature), also propagating state through function
> > > > > > call
> > > > > > chain seems to be overkill and not possible(cursor legacy
> > > > > > updates)
> > > > > > Querying for bw_state object from global state is not
> > > > > > possible as
> > > > > > it might get swapped with other global state.
> > > > > > So... just sticked can_sagv boolean into wm crtc state.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@intel.com>
> > > > > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.aus...@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h | 18 +
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 23 +-
> > > > > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 3 +
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 314
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 1 +
> > > > > > 5 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > > > index b5f61463922f..4083adf4b432 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> > > > > > @@ -18,6 +18,24 @@ struct intel_crtc_state;
> > > > > > struct intel_bw_state {
> > > > > > struct intel_global_state base;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * Contains a bit mask, used to determine, whether correspondent
> > > > > > + * pipe allows SAGV or not.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + u8 pipe_sagv_reject;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * Used to determine if we already had calculated
> > > > > > + * SAGV mask for this state once.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + bool sagv_calculated;
> > > > >
> > > > > Why would we even attempt to calculate it many times?
> > > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * Contains final SAGV decision based on current mask,
> > > > > > + * to prevent doing the same job over and over again.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + bool can_sagv;
> > > > >
> > > > > This is redundant since it's just sagv_reject==0.
> > > > >
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > unsigned int data_rate[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> > > > > > u8 num_active_planes[I915_MAX_PIPES];
> > > > > > };
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > > index 8f23c4d51c33..9e0058a78ea6 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > > > > @@ -14010,7 +14010,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct
> > > > > > intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > > > > /* Watermarks */
> > > > > > for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > > > > if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > > > > + (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > > + &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0)
> > > > > > &&
> > > > > > + (level == 0)))
> > > > >
> > > > > Pointless parens. Also we should do the check as
> > > > > 'level == 0 && wm_equals(sagv)' to skip the pointless comparison when
> > > > > level != 0.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess we can't read out sagv state due to the silly pcode interface?
> > > > >
> > > > > > continue;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > > @@ -14065,7 +14068,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct
> > > > > > intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > > > > /* Watermarks */
> > > > > > for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > > > > > if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||
> > > > > > + (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],
> > > > > > + &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0)
> > > > > > &&
> > > > > > + (level == 0)))
> > > > > > continue;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > > > @@ -15544,8 +15550,10 @@ static void
> > > > > > intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > > > * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV
> > > > > > when we
> > > > > > * have more then one pipe enabled
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > - if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > > > - intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> > > > > > + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > > > + intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > intel_modeset_verify_disabled(dev_priv, state);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > @@ -15645,8 +15653,10 @@ static void
> > > > > > intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > > > if (state->modeset)
> > > > > > intel_verify_planes(state);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > > > - intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {
> > > > > > + if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))
> > > > > > + intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(&state->base);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -15798,7 +15808,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct
> > > > > > drm_device *dev,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (state->global_state_changed) {
> > > > > > assert_global_state_locked(dev_priv);
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > dev_priv->active_pipes = state->active_pipes;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > > index 5e00e611f077..da0308b87dad 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > > > @@ -669,11 +669,14 @@ struct skl_plane_wm {
> > > > > > struct skl_wm_level wm[8];
> > > > > > struct skl_wm_level uv_wm[8];
> > > > > > struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;
> > > > > > + struct skl_wm_level sagv_wm0;
> > > > > > + struct skl_wm_level uv_sagv_wm0;
> > > > > > bool is_planar;
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct skl_pipe_wm {
> > > > > > struct skl_plane_wm planes[I915_MAX_PLANES];
> > > > > > + bool can_sagv;
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > enum vlv_wm_level {
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > > index c72fa59a8302..f598b55f4abc 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> > > > > > #include "i915_fixed.h"
> > > > > > #include "i915_irq.h"
> > > > > > #include "i915_trace.h"
> > > > > > +#include "display/intel_bw.h"
> > > > > > #include "intel_pm.h"
> > > > > > #include "intel_sideband.h"
> > > > > > #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"
> > > > > > @@ -3634,7 +3635,7 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct
> > > > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > > return IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static bool
> > > > > > +bool
> > > > > > intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > /* HACK! */
> > > > > > @@ -3757,39 +3758,25 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private
> > > > > > *dev_priv)
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > > > +static bool skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state
> > > > > > *crtc_state)
> > > > >
> > > > > This extraction looks to be trivially done as a separate patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > - struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > > > > > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev;
> > > > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > > > + struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> > > > > > to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
> > > > > > struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > > > > struct intel_plane *plane;
> > > > > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > > > > > - enum pipe pipe;
> > > > > > int level, latency;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> > > > > > - return false;
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > - /*
> > > > > > - * If there are no active CRTCs, no additional checks need be
> > > > > > performed
> > > > > > - */
> > > > > > - if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) == 0)
> > > > > > - return true;
> > > > > > + crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - /*
> > > > > > - * SKL+ workaround: bspec recommends we disable SAGV when we
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > - * more then one pipe enabled
> > > > > > - */
> > > > > > - if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1)
> > > > > > + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9) &&
> > > > > > (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1))
> > > > > > return false;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - /* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */
> > > > > > - pipe = ffs(state->active_pipes) - 1;
> > > > > > - crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
> > > > > > - crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > - if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags &
> > > > > > DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> > > > > > + if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags &
> > > > > > DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
> > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV for interlaced mode on pipe
> > > > > > %c\n",
> > > > > > + pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> > > > > > return false;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
> > > > > > struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> > > > > > @@ -3816,13 +3803,145 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct
> > > > > > intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > > > * incur memory latencies higher than
> > > > > > sagv_block_time_us we
> > > > > > * can't enable SAGV.
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > - if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
> > > > > > + if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us) {
> > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Latency %d < sagv block time %d,
> > > > > > no SAGV for pipe %c\n",
> > > > > > + latency,
> > > > > > dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us, pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> > > > > > return false;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return true;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +static bool
> > > > > > +tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static bool intel_calculate_sagv_result(struct intel_bw_state
> > > > > > *bw_state)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + return bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject == 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state
> > > > > > *state)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > + struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > > > + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > > > > > + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > > > > + struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> > > > > > + struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> > > > > > + int i;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * If SAGV is not supported we just can't do anything
> > > > > > + * not even set or reject SAGV points - just bail out.
> > > > > > + * Thus avoid needless calculations.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > > > > + new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > > > > + bool pipe_sagv_enable;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> > > > > > + old_bw_state = intel_bw_get_old_state(state);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_bw_state) ||
> > > > > > IS_ERR_OR_NULL(old_bw_state)) {a
> > > > > > + WARN(1, "Could not get bw_state\n");
> > > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > >
> > > > > What is this?
> > > > >
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + new_bw_state->sagv_calculated = false;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > > > > > + pipe_sagv_enable =
> > > > > > tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(new_crtc_state);
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + pipe_sagv_enable =
> > > > > > skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(new_crtc_state);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (pipe_sagv_enable)
> > > > > > + new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject &=
> > > > > > ~BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject |=
> > > > > > BIT(crtc->pipe);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!new_bw_state || !old_bw_state)
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + new_bw_state->can_sagv =
> > > > > > intel_calculate_sagv_result(new_bw_state);
> > > > > > + new_bw_state->sagv_calculated = true;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > > > > + new_crtc_state, i) {
> > > > > > + struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm =
> > > > > > &new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * Due to drm limitation at commit state, when
> > > > > > + * changes are written the whole atomic state is
> > > > > > + * zeroed away => which prevents from using it,
> > > > > > + * so just sticking it into pipe wm state for
> > > > > > + * keeping it simple - anyway this is related to wm.
> > > > > > + * Proper way in ideal universe would be of course not
> > > > > > + * to lose parent atomic state object from child
> > > > > > crtc_state,
> > > > > > + * and stick to OOP programming principles, which had
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > + * scientifically proven to work.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + pipe_wm->can_sagv = new_bw_state->can_sagv;
> > > > >
> > > > > I would probably name that wm->can_sagv as wm->use_sagv_wm so it's
> > > > > clear
> > > > > what it does.
> > > > >
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * For SAGV we need to account all the pipes,
> > > > > > + * not only the ones which are in state currently.
> > > > > > + * Grab all locks if we detect that we are actually
> > > > > > + * going to do something.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + if (new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject !=
> > > > > > old_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject) {
> > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("State %p: old sagv mask 0x%x, new sagv
> > > > > > mask 0x%x\n",
> > > > > > + state,
> > > > > > + old_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject,
> > > > > > + new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + ret =
> > > > > > intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> > > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not serialize global
> > > > > > state\n");
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * This function to be used before swap state
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
> > > > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > > > > + struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) {
> > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV support detected\n");
> > > > > > + return false;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bw_state)) {
> > > > >
> > > > > It can't be NULL. And if you get an error you must propagate it
> > > > > upwards.
> > > >
> > > > Can you please elaborate what I should do here?
> > > > Just want to save some time without wasting time guessing.
> > > > The options are:
> > > >
> > > > 1) If I propagate an error upwards, I obviously need to change a
> > > > signature
> > > > to int intel_can_enable_sagv, also if I do that usage at legacy
> > > > callsites
> > > > for this function will change, i.e you won't be able to call it like
> > > > if (intel_can_enable_sagv()) anymore. Is it that what you want?
> > > > Should note also that most of the legacy call sites are from
> > > > commit_tail
> > > > which wouldn't even propagate it further, because as you know it is
> > > > already
> > > > point of no return.
> > >
> > > Looks like intel_can_enable_sagv() should not exist anymore. We should
> > > just precompute the sagv mask in the bw atomic check, and then the commit
> > > time checks will simply become checks of the sagv mask.
> >
> > Was thinking about that, but then the question is how to deal with legacy
> > stuff - for instance, skl doesn't have QGV points at all, as I understand
> > some platforms just have it as a switch so we'll have to have somekind
> > of code like this anyway, i.e just checking if we can and then switch.
>
> We should just have two different ways to calculate whether a pipe can
> do sagv or not, one for skl+ another for icl+. Then we use the
> appropriate method when computing the sagv mask.
Yes, I have two ways already, but I would like to have sagv mask
computed in some centralized place i.e intel_compute_sagv_mask, so that
each part of code has its own responsiblity and it is not spread across
different
functions/areas(SOLID).
As I understand you want wm sagv checks to be done in allocate_pipe_ddb - ok
I can transfer it there, but still I would like pipe_reject_mask to be set
in a single place for obvious reasons.
Also still the question is how we evaluate pipe_reject_mask - as I understand
from you mean that I just nuke intel_can_enable_sagv and start just checking
pipe_reject_mask == 0 instead everywhere.
I'm still more in favour of having helpers for that - however in order to
avoid continuing wasting time discussing err propagation and other secondary
stuff - I'm fine with this :)
>
> >
> > Or basically we would be just inlining the intel_can_enable_sagv to
> > intel_atomic_commit_tail as I understand. Because yep for gen >=11
> > it just a matter of pre/post updating qgv points, but for skl we
> > still need some condition to check when we are calling intel_enable/disable
> > sagv
> >
> >
> > Stan
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
