On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:24:39AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya
> <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharad...@intel.com> wrote:
> > struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information
> > in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from.
> >
> > Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharad...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index e9ee4daa9320..be33cab6403d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -1647,7 +1647,8 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > #define HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->pipe_mask != 0)
> >
> > /* Only valid when HAS_DISPLAY() is true */
> > -#define INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED(dev_priv) (WARN_ON(!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)),
> > !i915_modparams.disable_display)
> > +#define INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED(dev_priv) \
> > + (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv)),
> > !i915_modparams.disable_display)
>
> Needs parens around the dev_priv macro argument.
Yeah, missed it. Thanks for pointing out.
Thanks,
Pankaj
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> >
> > static inline bool intel_vtd_active(void)
> > {
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
