Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Extend the timeout for pcode reads to 10ms as they should not be

s/10ms/20ms

> performed along critical paths, and succeeding after a short delay is
> better than failing entirely.
>
> References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1800
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> index 14daf6af6854..d5129c1dd452 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, 
> u32 mbox,
>  
>       mutex_lock(&i915->sb_lock);
>       err = __sandybridge_pcode_rw(i915, mbox, val, val1,
> -                                  500, 0,
> +                                  500, 20,
>                                    true);
>       mutex_unlock(&i915->sb_lock);
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to