While we ordinarily do not skip submit-fences due to the accompanying
hook that we want to callback on execution, a submit-fence on the same
timeline is meaningless.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index b4cc17fa9e8f..d4cbdee5a89a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -1242,6 +1242,9 @@ i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq,
                        continue;
                }
 
+               if (fence->context == rq->fence.context)
+                       continue;
+
                /*
                 * We don't squash repeated fence dependencies here as we
                 * want to run our callback in all cases.
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to