The TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION is supposed to generate more efficient code
than if (cond) trace(), which is what we are currently using inside the
register access functions.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h   | 8 +++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c     | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index d413812..29163a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
        }
 
        gt_core_status = readl(dev_priv->regs + GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS);
-       trace_i915_reg_rw(false, GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS, gt_core_status, 4);
+       trace_i915_reg_rw(false, GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS, gt_core_status, 4, true);
 
        rpmodectl1 = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_CONTROL);
        rcctl1 = I915_READ(GEN6_RC_CONTROL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 7d283b5..2933e2f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -406,10 +406,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_flip_complete,
            TP_printk("plane=%d, obj=%p", __entry->plane, __entry->obj)
 );
 
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_reg_rw,
-       TP_PROTO(bool write, u32 reg, u64 val, int len),
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(i915_reg_rw,
+       TP_PROTO(bool write, u32 reg, u64 val, int len, bool trace),
 
-       TP_ARGS(write, reg, val, len),
+       TP_ARGS(write, reg, val, len, trace),
+
+       TP_CONDITION(trace),
 
        TP_STRUCT__entry(
                __field(u64, val)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c
index cfa18fe..f6c22fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 
reg, bool trace) { \
                val = read##y(dev_priv->regs + reg); \
        } \
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->gt_lock, irqflags); \
-       if (trace) trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
+       trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
        return val; \
 }
 
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ __i915_read(64, q)
 void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val, bool 
trace) { \
        unsigned long irqflags; \
        u32 __fifo_ret = 0; \
-       if (trace) trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
+       trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
        spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->gt_lock, irqflags); \
        if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv), (reg))) { \
                __fifo_ret = __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(dev_priv); \
-- 
1.8.3.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to