Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-09-10 15:50:18)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> 
> As the previous patch fixed the places where we walk the whole scatterlist
> for DMA addresses, this patch fixes the random lookup functionality.
> 
> To achieve this we have to add a second lookup iterator and add a
> i915_gem_object_get_sg_dma helper, to be used analoguous to existing
> i915_gem_object_get_sg_dma. Therefore two lookup caches are maintained per
> object and they are flushed at the same point for simplicity. (Strictly
> speaking the DMA cache should be flushed from i915_gem_gtt_finish_pages,
> but today this conincides with unsetting of the pages in general.)
> 
> Partial VMA view is then fixed to use the new DMA lookup and properly
> query sg length.
> 
> v2:
>  * Checkpatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tom Murphy <murph...@tcd.ie>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <log...@deltatee.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c    |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    | 20 +++++++++++++++++-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h  | 17 ++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c     | 21 ++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c          |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h       |  5 +++++
>  6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
> index c8421fd9d2dc..ffeaf1b9b1bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>         obj->mm.madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
>         INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->mm.get_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
>         mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_page.lock);
> +       INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | 
> __GFP_NOWARN);
> +       mutex_init(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.lock);
>  
>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj))
>                 i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(to_i915(obj->base.dev),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> index d46db8d8f38e..44c6910e2669 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> @@ -275,8 +275,26 @@ int i915_gem_object_set_tiling(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>                                unsigned int tiling, unsigned int stride);
>  
>  struct scatterlist *
> +__i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> +                        struct i915_gem_object_page_iter *iter,
> +                        unsigned int n,
> +                        unsigned int *offset);
> +
> +static inline struct scatterlist *
>  i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> -                      unsigned int n, unsigned int *offset);
> +                      unsigned int n,
> +                      unsigned int *offset)
> +{
> +       return __i915_gem_object_get_sg(obj, &obj->mm.get_page, n, offset);
> +}

I wonder if get_sg_phys() is worth it to make it completely clear the
difference between it and get_sg_dma() (and .get_phys_page?) ?

> +
> +static inline struct scatterlist *
> +i915_gem_object_get_sg_dma(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> +                          unsigned int n,
> +                          unsigned int *offset)
> +{
> +       return __i915_gem_object_get_sg(obj, &obj->mm.get_dma_page, n, 
> offset);
> +}
>  
>  struct page *
>  i915_gem_object_get_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
> index b5c15557cc87..fedfebf13344 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,14 @@ struct i915_mmap_offset {
>         struct rb_node offset;
>  };
>  
> +struct i915_gem_object_page_iter {
> +       struct scatterlist *sg_pos;
> +       unsigned int sg_idx; /* in pages, but 32bit eek! */
> +
> +       struct radix_tree_root radix;
> +       struct mutex lock; /* protects this cache */
> +};

All alternatives to trying to avoid a second random lookup were
squashed, it really is two lists within one scatterlist and we do use
both page/dma lookups in non-trivial ways.

> +
>  struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>         struct drm_gem_object base;
>  
> @@ -246,13 +254,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>  
>                 I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(unsigned int page_mask);
>  
> -               struct i915_gem_object_page_iter {
> -                       struct scatterlist *sg_pos;
> -                       unsigned int sg_idx; /* in pages, but 32bit eek! */
> -
> -                       struct radix_tree_root radix;
> -                       struct mutex lock; /* protects this cache */
> -               } get_page;
> +               struct i915_gem_object_page_iter get_page;
> +               struct i915_gem_object_page_iter get_dma_page;
>  
>                 /**
>                  * Element within i915->mm.unbound_list or 
> i915->mm.bound_list,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> index e8a083743e09..04a3c1233f80 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object 
> *obj,
>  
>         obj->mm.get_page.sg_pos = pages->sgl;
>         obj->mm.get_page.sg_idx = 0;
> +       obj->mm.get_dma_page.sg_pos = pages->sgl;
> +       obj->mm.get_dma_page.sg_idx = 0;
>  
>         obj->mm.pages = pages;
>  
> @@ -155,6 +157,8 @@ static void __i915_gem_object_reset_page_iter(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>         rcu_read_lock();
>         radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &obj->mm.get_page.radix, &iter, 0)
>                 radix_tree_delete(&obj->mm.get_page.radix, iter.index);
> +       radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &obj->mm.get_dma_page.radix, &iter, 0)
> +               radix_tree_delete(&obj->mm.get_dma_page.radix, iter.index);
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
>  
> @@ -424,11 +428,12 @@ void __i915_gem_object_release_map(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>  }
>  
>  struct scatterlist *
> -i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> -                      unsigned int n,
> -                      unsigned int *offset)
> +__i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> +                        struct i915_gem_object_page_iter *iter,
> +                        unsigned int n,
> +                        unsigned int *offset)
>  {
> -       struct i915_gem_object_page_iter *iter = &obj->mm.get_page;
> +       const bool dma = iter == &obj->mm.get_dma_page;
>         struct scatterlist *sg;
>         unsigned int idx, count;
>  
> @@ -457,7 +462,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  
>         sg = iter->sg_pos;
>         idx = iter->sg_idx;
> -       count = __sg_page_count(sg);
> +       count = dma ? __sg_dma_page_count(sg) : __sg_page_count(sg);
>  
>         while (idx + count <= n) {
>                 void *entry;
> @@ -485,7 +490,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  
>                 idx += count;
>                 sg = ____sg_next(sg);
> -               count = __sg_page_count(sg);
> +               count = dma ? __sg_dma_page_count(sg) : __sg_page_count(sg);
>         }
>  
>  scan:
> @@ -503,7 +508,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_sg(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>         while (idx + count <= n) {
>                 idx += count;
>                 sg = ____sg_next(sg);
> -               count = __sg_page_count(sg);
> +               count = dma ? __sg_dma_page_count(sg) : __sg_page_count(sg);

Hmm. So for a coalesced dma entry, we must therefore end up with some
entries where the sg_dma_length is 0.

We then insert multiple sg for the same idx into the radix tree, causing
it to return an error, -EEXIST. We eat such errors and so overwrite the
empty entry with the final sg that actually has a valid length.

Ok. Looks like get_sg already handles zero length elements and you
caught all 3 __sg_page_count().

>         }
>  
>         *offset = n - idx;
> @@ -570,7 +575,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_dma_address_len(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>         struct scatterlist *sg;
>         unsigned int offset;
>  
> -       sg = i915_gem_object_get_sg(obj, n, &offset);
> +       sg = i915_gem_object_get_sg_dma(obj, n, &offset);
>  
>         if (len)
>                 *len = sg_dma_len(sg) - (offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> index 81c05f551b9c..95e77d56c1ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
>         if (ret)
>                 goto err_sg_alloc;
>  
> -       iter = i915_gem_object_get_sg(obj, view->partial.offset, &offset);
> +       iter = i915_gem_object_get_sg_dma(obj, view->partial.offset, &offset);
>         GEM_BUG_ON(!iter);
>  
>         sg = st->sgl;
> @@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
>         do {
>                 unsigned int len;
>  
> -               len = min(iter->length - (offset << PAGE_SHIFT),
> +               len = min(sg_dma_len(iter) - (offset << PAGE_SHIFT),
>                           count << PAGE_SHIFT);
>                 sg_set_page(sg, NULL, len, 0);
>                 sg_dma_address(sg) =

I didn't find any other users for get_sg() and this looks to catch all
the fixes required for using sg_dma.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h
> index 510856887628..102d8d7007b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scatterlist.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ static inline int __sg_page_count(const struct scatterlist 
> *sg)
>         return sg->length >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int __sg_dma_page_count(const struct scatterlist *sg)
> +{
> +       return sg_dma_len(sg) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Do we need cc:stable?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to