Op 30-10-2020 om 15:18 schreef Thomas Hellström (Intel): > > On 10/30/20 11:11 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 30-10-2020 om 10:26 schreef Thomas Hellström (Intel): >>> On 10/16/20 12:43 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>> We should not allow this any more, as it will break with the new userptr >>>> implementation, it could still be made to work, but there's no point in >>>> doing so. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> >>> Ifdefs don't appear consistent with the commit message. Wrong patch or >>> separate patch? >>> >>> Also please add a discussion what impact this has on existing user-space. >>> >>> >> Regarding ifdefs, all the userptr codeis unused when mmu notifers are not >> available, so I made it conditional on that. > > Yes I have nothing against the cange itself. But this is a fixup change that > has nothing to do with rejecting UNSYNCHRONIZED and thus it should be moved > to a separate commit or perhaps squashed in the big userptr rewrite? > > /Thomas > > I'll do it in a separate commit, since it's a separate change. :)
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
