From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> CT event handler is called under the gt->irq_lock from the interrupt handling paths so make it the same from the init path. I don't think this mismatch caused any functional issue but we need to wean the code of the global i915->irq_lock.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c index 220626c3ad81..6a0452815c41 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c @@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ static void guc_disable_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc) static int guc_enable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc) { - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_gt(guc)->i915; + struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc); + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915; int ret; GEM_BUG_ON(guc_communication_enabled(guc)); @@ -223,9 +224,9 @@ static int guc_enable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc) guc_enable_interrupts(guc); /* check for CT messages received before we enabled interrupts */ - spin_lock_irq(&i915->irq_lock); + spin_lock_irq(>->irq_lock); intel_guc_ct_event_handler(&guc->ct); - spin_unlock_irq(&i915->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(>->irq_lock); drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "GuC communication enabled\n"); -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx