On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:20 PM Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/20/20 1:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > index d5ece7a9a403..f94405d43fd1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> > @@ -180,6 +180,22 @@ static inline void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask) 
> > { }
> >  static inline void fs_reclaim_release(gfp_t gfp_mask) { }
> >  #endif
> >
> > +/**
> > + * might_alloc - Marks possible allocation sites
>
>                     Mark
>
> > + * @gfp_mask: gfp_t flags that would be use to allocate
>
>                                            used
>
> > + *
> > + * Similar to might_sleep() and other annotations this can be used in 
> > functions
>
>                                          annotations,
>
> > + * that might allocate, but often dont. Compiles to nothing without
>
>                                      don't.
>
> > + * CONFIG_LOCKDEP. Includes a conditional might_sleep() if @gfp allows 
> > blocking.
>
> ?                                            might_sleep_if() if

That's one if too many, I'll do the others for next round. Thanks for
taking a look.
-Daniel

>
> > + */
> > +static inline void might_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > +     fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_mask);
> > +     fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
> > +
> > +     might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask));
> > +}
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to