Although I could not reproduce this (different compiler version,
perhaps), reportedly we get:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:1943:27: warning: ‘score’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
Drop the 'score' variable altogether as it's not really needed.
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 42e6e8a..3fbba2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1905,8 +1905,6 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
} else
busy = false;
} else {
- int score;
-
/* We always increment the hangcheck score
* if the ring is busy and still processing
* the same request, so that no single request
@@ -1927,20 +1925,18 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
switch (ring->hangcheck.action) {
case HANGCHECK_WAIT:
- score = 0;
break;
case HANGCHECK_ACTIVE:
- score = BUSY;
+ ring->hangcheck.score += BUSY;
break;
case HANGCHECK_KICK:
- score = KICK;
+ ring->hangcheck.score += KICK;
break;
case HANGCHECK_HUNG:
- score = HUNG;
+ ring->hangcheck.score += HUNG;
stuck[i] = true;
break;
}
- ring->hangcheck.score += score;
}
} else {
/* Gradually reduce the count so that we catch DoS
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
