On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:57 PM Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> First of all drivers have absolutely no business to dig into the internals
> of an irq descriptor. That's core code and subject to change. All of this
> information is readily available to /proc/interrupts in a safe and race
> free way.
>
> Remove the inspection code which is a blatant violation of subsystem
> boundaries and racy against concurrent modifications of the interrupt
> descriptor.
>
> Print the irq line instead so the information can be looked up in a sane
> way in /proc/interrupts.
...
> - seq_printf(s, "%3i: %6i %4i",
> + seq_printf(s, "%3i: %6i %4i %4i\n",
Seems different specifiers, I think the intention was something like
seq_printf(s, "%3i: %4i %6i %4i\n",
> line,
> + line + irq_first,
> num_interrupts[line],
> num_wake_interrupts[line]);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
