On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 10:10, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> The caller determines if the failure is an error or not, so avoid
> warning when we will try again and succeed. For example,
>
> <7> [111.319321] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x20
> <3> [111.319340] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status = 
> 0x00000020
> <3> [111.319606] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status: 
> Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x10, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x00
> <7> [111.320045] [drm:__uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -110; will 
> reset and retry 2 more time(s)
> <7> [111.322978] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x8002f0ec
>
> should not have been reported as a _test_ failure, as the GuC was
> successfully loaded on the second attempt and the system remained
> operational.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2797
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to