On 2020-12-22 at 20:19:49 +0530, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 334ba1775cd3..65406d4ccdbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>        */
>       cpu_latency_qos_update_request(&i915->pm_qos, 0);
>  
> -     intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp);
> +     intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(intel_dp);
>  
>       /* Try to wait for any previous AUX channel activity */
>       for (try = 0; try < 3; try++) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index 3e62d1450682..dfd6722bc40e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static bool edp_have_panel_vdd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       return intel_de_read(dev_priv, _pp_ctrl_reg(intel_dp)) & EDP_FORCE_VDD;
>  }
>  
> -void intel_dp_check_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
IMHO comment to take pps_lock would be useful here.
Thanks,
Anshuman.
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index 4780b59a59df..8dda282abd42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_pps_unlock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> intel_wakeref_t wake
>  #define with_intel_pps_lock(dp, wf)                                          
> \
>       for ((wf) = intel_pps_lock(dp); (wf); (wf) = intel_pps_unlock((dp), 
> (wf)))
>  
> -void intel_dp_check_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_backlight_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_backlight_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_backlight_power(struct intel_connector *connector, bool 
> enable);
> @@ -31,6 +30,7 @@ bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
>  void intel_pps_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to