If any of the perf tests run into 0 time, not only are we liable to
divide by zero, but the result would be highly questionable.
Nevertheless, let's not have a div-by-zero error.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index 75839db63bea..59c58a276677 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -852,6 +852,9 @@ static int _perf_memcpy(struct intel_memory_region *src_mr,
}
sort(t, ARRAY_SIZE(t), sizeof(*t), wrap_ktime_compare, NULL);
+ if (!t[0])
+ continue;
+
pr_info("%s src(%s, %s) -> dst(%s, %s) %14s %4llu KiB copy:
%5lld MiB/s\n",
__func__,
src_mr->name,
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
