On 04/02/2021 11:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-02-04 11:18:29)
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-04 11:07:07)
On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index b56e321ef003..280d84c4e4b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static int virtual_prio(const struct intel_engine_execlists
*el)
static bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
const struct i915_request *rq)
{
+ const struct i915_sched *se = &engine->active;
There's only two instances in this patch which do not use
intel_engine_get_scheduler. Intended?
They were the ones I earmarked for being replaced by the scheduler
object being passed down. Having down that I can do the replacement here
and remove the conflicts with the final result later.
The catch here was the const. We can't make the getter take a const*
at this point, so I left it as &engine->active to not have to remove the
constness.
It's fine, I'm mostly interested in the goodness of the end result.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
