On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:32:47AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> It's independent of the applied patch.
> My problem goes away with SNA but still exists with UXA.
> 
> As said in my previous analysis... switching back to Ubuntu's graphics
> did not show the symptoms, too.
> 
> It's interesting to see, it is a problem of the intel-ddx.

Nope, it's just that uxa and sna have completely different buffer object
usage patterns. Not the first time only one of them hits an issue ...

> Anyway, SNA seems here to be approx. 20% faster in gtkperf-0.40, so I
> will use it.
> 
> I am open and willing to test any patches you will provide.
> Please, let me know.

Found a new bugger, please test the below patch.

Thanks, Daniel
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index ef92c69..e0bff07 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2616,6 +2616,9 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
        drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
        int ret;
 
+       /* For now we only ever use 1 vma per object */
+       WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(&obj->vma_list));
+
        if (list_empty(&vma->vma_link))
                return 0;
 
@@ -2661,7 +2664,9 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
        drm_mm_remove_node(&vma->node);
 
 destroy:
-       i915_gem_vma_destroy(vma);
+       /* Keep the vma as a placeholder in the execbuffer reservation lists */
+       if (!list_empty(&vma->exec_list))
+               i915_gem_vma_destroy(vma);
 
        /* Since the unbound list is global, only move to that list if
         * no more VMAs exist.
@@ -4171,10 +4176,6 @@ void i915_gem_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma)
        WARN_ON(vma->node.allocated);
        list_del(&vma->vma_link);
 
-       /* Keep the vma as a placeholder in the execbuffer reservation lists */
-       if (!list_empty(&vma->exec_list))
-               return;
-
        kfree(vma);
 }
 
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to