Patch likely is temporary - until Jason will figure out where to put his code and avoid unnecessary walk over the objects array. I need this to find out what tests will fail when we disallow passing relocations data in execbuf.
Current patch https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/424069/?series=87980&rev=2 still allows passing relocation data. So we got no -EINVAL for new hardware what is not we want. When pread/pwrite drop + allocator series will be merge we want to rerun of that series and see what's failing on CI. v2: fixing incidentally left tested comparison (< 9) instead proper one on newer gens (< 12) Cc: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> Zbigniew Kempczyński (1): drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation support on all new hardware .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) -- 2.26.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
