On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:31:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.12 next-20210429]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bernard-Zhao/drm-i915-Use-might_alloc/20210429-104516
> base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
> config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> #
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9fbd0c1741ce06241105d753ff3432ab55f3e94a
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review
> Bernard-Zhao/drm-i915-Use-might_alloc/20210429-104516
> git checkout 9fbd0c1741ce06241105d753ff3432ab55f3e94a
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make W=1 W=1 ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c: In function
> '__i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence':
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c:344:2: error: implicit declaration of
> >> function 'might_alloc'; did you mean 'might_lock'?
> >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 344 | might_alloc(gfp);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | might_lock
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
I think you're missing an include or something. The other patch you've
done seems good, I queued that up in drm-intel-gt-next for 5.14.
Thanks, Daniel
>
>
> vim +344 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c
>
> 335
> 336 static int __i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence
> *fence,
> 337 struct i915_sw_fence
> *signaler,
> 338 wait_queue_entry_t
> *wq, gfp_t gfp)
> 339 {
> 340 unsigned int pending;
> 341 unsigned long flags;
> 342
> 343 debug_fence_assert(fence);
> > 344 might_alloc(gfp);
> 345
> 346 if (i915_sw_fence_done(signaler)) {
> 347 i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(fence,
> signaler->error);
> 348 return 0;
> 349 }
> 350
> 351 debug_fence_assert(signaler);
> 352
> 353 /* The dependency graph must be acyclic. */
> 354 if (unlikely(i915_sw_fence_check_if_after(fence,
> signaler)))
> 355 return -EINVAL;
> 356
> 357 pending = I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_FENCE;
> 358 if (!wq) {
> 359 wq = kmalloc(sizeof(*wq), gfp);
> 360 if (!wq) {
> 361 if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> 362 return -ENOMEM;
> 363
> 364 i915_sw_fence_wait(signaler);
> 365 i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(fence,
> signaler->error);
> 366 return 0;
> 367 }
> 368
> 369 pending |= I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_ALLOC;
> 370 }
> 371
> 372 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wq->entry);
> 373 wq->flags = pending;
> 374 wq->func = i915_sw_fence_wake;
> 375 wq->private = fence;
> 376
> 377 i915_sw_fence_await(fence);
> 378
> 379 spin_lock_irqsave(&signaler->wait.lock, flags);
> 380 if (likely(!i915_sw_fence_done(signaler))) {
> 381 __add_wait_queue_entry_tail(&signaler->wait,
> wq);
> 382 pending = 1;
> 383 } else {
> 384 i915_sw_fence_wake(wq, 0, signaler->error,
> NULL);
> 385 pending = 0;
> 386 }
> 387 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&signaler->wait.lock, flags);
> 388
> 389 return pending;
> 390 }
> 391
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
