Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
/* No downstream info to read */
- if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
- dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
- !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
+ if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
return 0;
/* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also
advertising they have a
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
