On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:38:06AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
> [also build test ERROR on drm-tip/drm-tip drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next 
> next-20210503]
> [cannot apply to tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next v5.12]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Ekstrand/drm-i915-gem-ioctl-clean-ups-v5/20210504-000132
> base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
> config: i386-randconfig-r013-20210503 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         # 
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/66ce6ce447515a302711a65f731d1e6f66abdcdc
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
> Jason-Ekstrand/drm-i915-gem-ioctl-clean-ups-v5/20210504-000132
>         git checkout 66ce6ce447515a302711a65f731d1e6f66abdcdc
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make W=1 W=1 ARCH=i386 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c:2543:1: error: no previous 
> >> prototype for 'lazy_create_context_locked' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>     2543 | lazy_create_context_locked(struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv,
>          | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Ah you missed the static, and I missed that in review. That one should be
fixed :-)
-Daniel

> 
> 
> vim +/lazy_create_context_locked +2543 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> 
>   2541        
>   2542        struct i915_gem_context *
> > 2543        lazy_create_context_locked(struct drm_i915_file_private 
> > *file_priv,
>   2544                                   struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc, 
> u32 id)
>   2545        {
>   2546                struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
>   2547                void *old;
>   2548        
>   2549                lockdep_assert_held(&file_priv->proto_context_lock);
>   2550        
>   2551                ctx = i915_gem_create_context(file_priv->dev_priv, pc);
>   2552                if (IS_ERR(ctx))
>   2553                        return ctx;
>   2554        
>   2555                gem_context_register(ctx, file_priv, id);
>   2556        
>   2557                old = xa_erase(&file_priv->proto_context_xa, id);
>   2558                GEM_BUG_ON(old != pc);
>   2559                proto_context_close(pc);
>   2560        
>   2561                /* One for the xarray and one for the caller */
>   2562                return i915_gem_context_get(ctx);
>   2563        }
>   2564        
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org


> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to