Hi, On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 15:34, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:30:45AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > > +No major changes are required to the uAPI for basic GuC submission. The > > only > > +change is a new scheduler attribute: > > I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_STATIC_PRIORITY_MAP. > > +This attribute indicates the 2k i915 user priority levels are statically > > mapped > > +into 3 levels as follows: > > + > > +* -1k to -1 Low priority > > +* 0 Medium priority > > +* 1 to 1k High priority > > + > > +This is needed because the GuC only has 4 priority bands. The highest > > priority > > +band is reserved with the kernel. This aligns with the DRM scheduler > > priority > > +levels too. > > Please Cc: mesa and get an ack from Jason Ekstrand or Ken Graunke on this, > just to be sure.
A reference to the actual specs this targets would help. I don't have oneAPI to hand if it's relevant, but the two in graphics world are https://www.khronos.org/registry/EGL/extensions/IMG/EGL_IMG_context_priority.txt and https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/specs/1.2-extensions/html/chap5.html#devsandqueues-priority - both of them pretty much say that the implementation may do anything or nothing at all, so this isn't a problem for spec conformance, only a matter of user priority (sorry). Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
