On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].

At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits between
the i915 and the GPU. It offloads some of the scheduling of contexts
from the i915 and programs the GPU to submit contexts. The i915
communicates with the GuC and the GuC communicates with the GPU.

GuC submission will be disabled by default on all current upstream
platforms behind a module parameter - enable_guc. A value of 3 will
enable submission and HuC loading via the GuC. GuC submission should
work on all gen11+ platforms assuming the GuC firmware is present.

Some thoughts mostly relating to future platforms where GuC will be the only option, and to some extent platforms where it will be possible to turn it on for one reason or another.

Debuggability - in the context of having an upstream way/tool for capturing and viewing GuC logs usable for attaching to bug reports.

Currently i915 logs, can provide traces via tracepoints and trace printk, and GPU error capture state, which provides often sufficient trail of evidence to debug issues.

We need to make sure GuC does is not a black box in this respect. By this I mean it does not hide a large portion of the execution flows from upstream observability.

This could mean a tool in IGT to access/capture GuC logs and update bug filing instructions.

Leading from here is probably the need for the GuC firmware team to cross the internal-upstream boundary and deal with such bug reports on upstream trackers. Upstream GuC is unlikely to work if we don't have such plan and commitment.

Also leading from here is the need for GPU error capture to be on par from day one which is I believe still not there in the firmware.

Another, although unrelated, missing feature on my wish list is firmware support for wiring up accurate engine busyness stats to i915 PMU. I believe this is also being worked on but I don't know when is the expected delivery.

If we are tracking a TODO list of items somewhere I think these ones should be definitely considered.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to