> -----Original Message----- > From: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> > Sent: 18 May 2021 14:21 > To: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadh...@intel.com>; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org; Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pan...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/jsl: Add W/A 1409054076 for JSL > > On Tue, 18 May 2021, "Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX" > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadh...@intel.com> wrote: > > Thanks for review. Responses inline. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> > >> Sent: 17 May 2021 19:43 > >> To: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > >> <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadh...@intel.com>; intel- > >> g...@lists.freedesktop.org; Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pan...@intel.com> > >> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/jsl: Add W/A 1409054076 > >> for JSL > >> > >> On Thu, 13 May 2021, Tejas Upadhyay > >> <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadh...@intel.com> wrote: > >> > When pipe A is disabled and MIPI DSI is enabled on pipe B, the AMT > >> > KVMR feature will incorrectly see pipe A as enabled. > >> > Set 0x42080 bit 23=1 before enabling DSI on pipe B and leave it set > >> > while DSI is enabled on pipe B. No impact to setting it all the time. > >> > > >> > Changes since V1: > >> > - ./dim checkpatch errors addressed > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay > >> > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadh...@intel.com> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 38 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + > >> > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c > >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c > >> > index ce544e20f35c..e5a6660861e8 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c > >> > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ > >> > #include "skl_scaler.h" > >> > #include "skl_universal_plane.h" > >> > > >> > +static bool gen11_dsi_get_hw_state(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > >> > + enum pipe *pipe); > >> > static int header_credits_available(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > >> > enum transcoder dsi_trans) { @@ > >> > -1036,9 > +1038,26 @@ > >> > static void gen11_dsi_enable_transcoder(struct > >> intel_encoder *encoder) > >> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev); > >> > struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(encoder); > >> > enum port port; > >> > + enum pipe pipe; > >> > enum transcoder dsi_trans; > >> > u32 tmp; > >> > > >> > + /* > >> > + * WA 1409054076:JSL > >> > + * When pipe A is disabled and MIPI DSI is enabled on pipe B, > >> > + * the AMT KVMR feature will incorrectly see pipe A as enabled. > >> > + * Set 0x42080 bit 23=1 before enabling DSI on pipe B and leave > >> > + * it set while DSI is enabled on pipe B > >> > + */ > >> > + gen11_dsi_get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe); > >> > >> That function is only for reading the state for taking over hardware > >> state at probe and hardware/software state verification after modeset. > >> > >> It reads the state that is being set later in this function, so it's > >> never going to be correct here! Also, we try not to do stuff based on > >> the hardware state, but rather the software state. > > > > Okay I will correct that. > > > >> > >> > + if (IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_JASPERLAKE) && > >> > + pipe == PIPE_B && > >> > + dev_priv->active_pipes != BIT(PIPE_A) && > >> > + !(intel_de_read(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1) & > >> > + IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A)) { > >> > + intel_de_write(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1, > >> > + intel_de_read(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1) | > >> IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A); > >> > + } > >> > >> As far as I understand the explanation, we can set this regardless of > >> whether pipe A is disabled or not, and we can just set it based on > >> where DSI is enabled. > >> > >> It should probably also be IS_JSL_EHL(). > > > > Will it not affect if pipe A is enabled and we set intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, > CHICKEN_PAR1_1, 0, IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A);. What I could understand is > we only set this bit when pipe A is disable and we have MIPI DSI enable on > pipe B. Correct me again If I am getting it wrong. > > The spec description is lacking, really. But, how are we supposed to interpret > "No impact to setting it all the time."? > Ok I think we can ignore pipe A status with statement " Set 0x42080 bit 23=1 before enabling DSI on pipe B and leave it set while DSI is enabled on pipe B"(Here There is no mention of pipe A for leaving the bit set). I will modify accordingly. > Only setting the bit when pipe A is disabled is going to be harder. That's > another thing that was wrong with using gen11_dsi_get_hw_state(); it'll only > take DSI into account, not *other* things that might be using pipe A. > > Do you actually have a real world bug where you can see this? No I don't have real world bug. > > > Also Bspec says clearly workaround is for JSL only. Should I consider > > EHL also in this? > > Yes, they're practically the same, and we don't even have > IS_JASPERLAKE() or IS_ELKHARTLAKE() for that precise reason. There are a > couple of rare cases where we need to make the distinction. > > > > >> > >> With pipe from new_crtc_state: > >> > >> if (IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv) && pipe == PIPE_B) > >> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1, 0, > >> IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A); > >> > >> To disable, with pipe from old_crtc_state: > >> > >> if (IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv) && pipe == PIPE_B) > >> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1, IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A, > >> 0); > >> > >> At the right locations. > > > > Ok I will take this into consideration. > > > >> > >> > for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) { > >> > dsi_trans = dsi_port_to_transcoder(port); > >> > tmp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PIPECONF(dsi_trans)); @@ - > >> 1245,6 > >> > +1264,7 @@ static void gen11_dsi_enable(struct intel_atomic_state > >> > *state, > >> > > >> > drm_WARN_ON(state->base.dev, crtc_state->has_pch_encoder); > >> > > >> > + > >> > /* step6d: enable dsi transcoder */ > >> > gen11_dsi_enable_transcoder(encoder); > >> > > >> > @@ -1260,9 +1280,27 @@ static void > >> > gen11_dsi_disable_transcoder(struct > >> intel_encoder *encoder) > >> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev); > >> > struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(encoder); > >> > enum port port; > >> > + enum pipe pipe; > >> > enum transcoder dsi_trans; > >> > u32 tmp; > >> > > >> > + /* > >> > + * WA 1409054076:JSL > >> > + * When pipe A is disabled and MIPI DSI is enabled on pipe B, > >> > + * the AMT KVMR feature will incorrectly see pipe A as enabled. > >> > + * Set 0x42080 bit 23=1 before enabling DSI on pipe B and leave > >> > + * it set while DSI is enabled on pipe B > >> > + */ > >> > + gen11_dsi_get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe); > >> > + if (IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_JASPERLAKE) && > >> > + pipe == PIPE_B && > >> > + dev_priv->active_pipes != BIT(PIPE_A) && > >> > + (intel_de_read(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1) & > >> > + IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A)) { > >> > + intel_de_write(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1, > >> > + intel_de_read(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1) & > >> > + !IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A); > >> > + } > >> > for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) { > >> > dsi_trans = dsi_port_to_transcoder(port); > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 871d839dfcb8..8b67cd14ff7e > >> > 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >> > @@ -8039,6 +8039,7 @@ enum { > >> > # define CHICKEN3_DGMG_DONE_FIX_DISABLE (1 << 2) > >> > > >> > #define CHICKEN_PAR1_1 _MMIO(0x42080) > >> > +#define IGNORE_KVMR_PIPE_A BIT(23) > >> > >> REG_BIT(), not BIT(). Please read the big comment near the top of the file. > >> Please observe the REG_BIT() on the very next line. > > > > Sorry to say but there is no uniformity in term of which macro to use. > > Some places I have got review earlier to add BIT() and I can see at some > places not BIT() used nor REG_BIT(). I will correct for this matter to use > REG_BIT(). > > In i915_reg.h *always* use REG_BIT(). I just sent a patch to fix accidental > uses of BIT() that have crept in. > > > BR, > Jani. > > > > > Thanks, > > Tejas > >> > >> > #define KBL_ARB_FILL_SPARE_22 REG_BIT(22) > >> > #define DIS_RAM_BYPASS_PSR2_MAN_TRACK (1 << 16) > >> > #define SKL_DE_COMPRESSED_HASH_MODE (1 << 15) > >> > >> -- > >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/jsl: Add W/A 1409054076 for JSL
Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX Tue, 18 May 2021 02:08:52 -0700
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/jsl: A... Tejas Upadhyay
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: w... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warni... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success ... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure ... Patchwork
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i9... Jani Nikula
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] dr... Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2... Jani Nikula
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATC... Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX