On 2021-06-28 at 20:08:29 +0530, Bommu Krishnaiah wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bo...@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c
> index 23c59ce66cee5..5df7b8af6fdb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c
> @@ -208,11 +208,15 @@ static struct intel_context *__migrate_engines(struct
> intel_gt *gt)
>
> count = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gt->engine_class[COPY_ENGINE_CLASS]); i++) {
> +
> engine = gt->engine_class[COPY_ENGINE_CLASS][i];
> if (engine_supports_migration(engine))
> engines[count++] = engine;
> }
>
> + if (count == 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> +
> return intel_context_create(engines[random_index(count)]);
This Kclockwork warning/error is false positive.
As intel_migrate_copy->intel_migrate_create_context->__migrate_engines is called
after the checkfor valid m->context which is created for first copy engine.
So atleast one blitter is assured. hence we can ignore this Kclockwork
result.
Ram.
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
