I think this is just the right thing to do, so: Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Paulo Zanoni <przan...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > > We don't seem to be using the pointer after it's unmapped, so this > patch doesn't fix any bug I can reproduce. > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > index a01e0f8..dd88c08 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > @@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ void intel_opregion_fini(struct drm_device *dev) > opregion->swsci = NULL; > opregion->asle = NULL; > opregion->vbt = NULL; > + opregion->lid_state = NULL; > } > > static void swsci_setup(struct drm_device *dev) > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
