Inside drm_is_current_master, using the outer drm_device.master_mutex
to protect reads of drm_file.master makes the function prone to creating
lock hierarchy inversions. Instead, we can use the
drm_file.master_lookup_lock that sits at the bottom of the lock
hierarchy.

Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheon...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
index f00354bec3fb..9c24b8cc8e36 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
@@ -63,8 +63,9 @@
 
 static bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv)
 {
-       lockdep_assert_held_once(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex);
-
+       /* Either drm_device.master_mutex or drm_file.master_lookup_lock
+        * should be held here.
+        */
        return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == 
fpriv->minor->dev->master;
 }
 
@@ -82,9 +83,9 @@ bool drm_is_current_master(struct drm_file *fpriv)
 {
        bool ret;
 
-       mutex_lock(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex);
+       spin_lock(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock);
        ret = drm_is_current_master_locked(fpriv);
-       mutex_unlock(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex);
+       spin_unlock(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock);
 
        return ret;
 }
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to