Op 31-08-2021 om 12:29 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin: > > On 31/08/2021 10:34, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 31-08-2021 om 11:18 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin: >>> >>> On 30/08/2021 13:09, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>> vma->obj and vma->resv are now never NULL, and some checks can be removed. >>> >>> Is the direction here compatible with SVM / VM_BIND? >> >> >> Yeah, it should be. The changes here make the obj->resv->lock the main lock, >> so it should at least simplify locking for VM_BIND. > > Hm but what will vma->obj point to in case of SVM, when there is no GEM BO?
Probably to one of the bo's in i915_vm, or a dummy bo that least shares the vm_resv object, similar to the aliasing gtt handling.
