On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:14:00AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:54:40AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2021, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
Although commit 9dd4b065446a ("drm/i915/gt: Move pm debug files into a
gt aware debugfs") says it was moving debug files to gt/, the
i915_frequency_info file was left behind and its implementation copied
into drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c. Over time we had several
patches having to change both places to keep them in sync (and some
patches failing to do so). The initial idea was to remove i915_frequency_info,
but there are user space tools using it. From a quick code search there
are other scripts and test tools besides igt, so it's not simply
updating igt to get rid of the older file.
Here we export a function using drm_printer as parameter and make
both show() implementations to call this same function. Aside from a few
variable name differences, for i915_frequency_info this brings a few
lines that were not previously printed: RP UP EI, RP UP THRESHOLD, RP
DOWN THRESHOLD and RP DOWN EI. These came in as part of
commit 9c878557b1eb ("drm/i915/gt: Use the RPM config register to
determine clk frequencies"), which didn't change both places.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c | 127 ++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 227 +-----------------------
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 282 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
index f6733f279890..6a27c011d0ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
@@ -240,9 +240,8 @@ static int drpc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
}
DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(drpc);
-static int frequency_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
+void debugfs_gt_pm_frequency_dump(struct intel_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
The debugfs prefix belongs to debugfs, and I don't think we should have
non-static functions with that prefix.
I know it's in line with what's currently in the file, and I've
complained about it before, but apparently that hasn't been enough.
I was surprised by the prefix too.
intel_gt_pm_debugfs.[hc] - would that be better or do you have another
suggestion?
Something like the below:
renamed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c ->
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_debugfs.c
renamed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h ->
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_debugfs.h
renamed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c ->
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_engines_debugfs.c
renamed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.h ->
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_engines_debugfs.h
renamed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c ->
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
renamed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.h ->
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.h
and then rename the functions/macros in these files to follow th
filename
Lucas De Marchi
thanks
Lucas De Marchi
