On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:16:45AM +0300, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 03:23 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > A follow-up change will start to disconnect/re-connect PHYs around AUX
> > transfers and modeset enable/disables. To prepare for that add a new
> > TypeC PHY disconnected mode, to help tracking the TC-cold blocking power
> > domain status (no power domain in disconnected state, mode dependent
> > power domain in connected state).
> > 
> > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c      | 26 ++++++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > index d425ee77aad71..87b96fed5e0ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ enum tc_port {
> >  };
> >  
> >  enum tc_port_mode {
> > +   TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED,
> >     TC_PORT_TBT_ALT,
> >     TC_PORT_DP_ALT,
> >     TC_PORT_LEGACY,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > index aa4c1e5e0c002..77b16a7c43466 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > @@ -12,13 +12,14 @@
> >  static const char *tc_port_mode_name(enum tc_port_mode mode)
> >  {
> >     static const char * const names[] = {
> > +           [TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED] = "disconnected",
> >             [TC_PORT_TBT_ALT] = "tbt-alt",
> >             [TC_PORT_DP_ALT] = "dp-alt",
> >             [TC_PORT_LEGACY] = "legacy",
> >     };
> >  
> >     if (WARN_ON(mode >= ARRAY_SIZE(names)))
> > -           mode = TC_PORT_TBT_ALT;
> > +           mode = TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED;
> >  
> >     return names[mode];
> >  }
> > @@ -513,10 +514,11 @@ static void icl_tc_phy_disconnect(struct 
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >     case TC_PORT_LEGACY:
> >     case TC_PORT_DP_ALT:
> >             tc_phy_take_ownership(dig_port, false);
> > -           dig_port->tc_mode = TC_PORT_TBT_ALT;
> > -           break;
> > +           fallthrough;
> >     case TC_PORT_TBT_ALT:
> > -           /* Nothing to do, we stay in TBT-alt mode */
> > +           dig_port->tc_mode = TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED;
> > +           fallthrough;
> > +   case TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED:
> >             break;
> >     default:
> >             MISSING_CASE(dig_port->tc_mode);
> > @@ -621,31 +623,34 @@ void intel_tc_port_sanitize(struct intel_digital_port 
> > *dig_port)
> >  {
> >     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> >     struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dig_port->base;
> > -   intel_wakeref_t tc_cold_wref;
> >     int active_links = 0;
> >  
> >     mutex_lock(&dig_port->tc_lock);
> > -   tc_cold_wref = tc_cold_block(dig_port);
> >  
> > -   dig_port->tc_mode = intel_tc_port_get_current_mode(dig_port);
> >     if (dig_port->dp.is_mst)
> >             active_links = intel_dp_mst_encoder_active_links(dig_port);
> >     else if (encoder->base.crtc)
> >             active_links = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc)->active;
> >  
> > +   drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED);
> >     if (active_links) {
> > +           intel_wakeref_t tc_cold_wref = tc_cold_block(dig_port);
> > +
> > +           dig_port->tc_mode = intel_tc_port_get_current_mode(dig_port);
> > +
> >             if (!icl_tc_phy_is_connected(dig_port))
> >                     drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> >                                 "Port %s: PHY disconnected with %d active 
> > link(s)\n",
> >                                 dig_port->tc_port_name, active_links);
> >             intel_tc_port_link_init_refcount(dig_port, active_links);
> > +
> > +           tc_cold_unblock(dig_port, tc_cold_wref);
> >     }
> >  
> >     drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Port %s: sanitize mode (%s)\n",
> >                 dig_port->tc_port_name,
> >                 tc_port_mode_name(dig_port->tc_mode));
> >  
> > -   tc_cold_unblock(dig_port, tc_cold_wref);
> >     mutex_unlock(&dig_port->tc_lock);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -704,6 +709,10 @@ static void __intel_tc_port_lock(struct 
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> >             tc_cold_unblock(dig_port, tc_cold_wref);
> >     }
> >  
> > +   drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, dig_port->tc_mode == TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED);
> 
> This warning will be printed everytime it goes to suspend, other than that 
> lgtm.

By the end of the patchset this shouldn't warn. But yes, for bisect to
work this should've been added only in patch 11, I'll move it there.

> > +   drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_TBT_ALT &&
> > +                           !tc_phy_is_owned(dig_port));
> > +
> >     drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, dig_port->tc_lock_wakeref);
> >     dig_port->tc_lock_wakeref = wakeref;
> >  }
> > @@ -816,6 +825,7 @@ void intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port 
> > *dig_port, bool is_legacy)
> >  
> >     mutex_init(&dig_port->tc_lock);
> >     dig_port->tc_legacy_port = is_legacy;
> > +   dig_port->tc_mode = TC_PORT_DISCONNECTED;
> >     dig_port->tc_link_refcount = 0;
> >     tc_port_load_fia_params(i915, dig_port);
> >  }
> 

Reply via email to