[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/28] drm/ttm: use the new iterator in ttm_bo_flush_all_fences

[Christian König]

This is probably a fix since we didn't even grabed a reference to the
fences.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index d62b2013c367..3934ee225c78 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -269,23 +269,15 @@ static int ttm_bo_individualize_resv(struct 
ttm_buffer_object *bo)
 static void ttm_bo_flush_all_fences(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
 {
        struct dma_resv *resv = &bo->base._resv;
-       struct dma_resv_list *fobj;
+       struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
        struct dma_fence *fence;
-       int i;
-
-       rcu_read_lock();
-       fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(resv);
-       fence = dma_resv_excl_fence(resv);
-       if (fence && !fence->ops->signaled)
-               dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
-
-       for (i = 0; fobj && i < fobj->shared_count; ++i) {
-               fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
 
+       dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, resv, true);
+       dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
                if (!fence->ops->signaled)
                        dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
        }
-       rcu_read_unlock();
+       dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1