On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:12:47PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> > 
>> > Use REG_BIT() & co. for PIPEMISC* bits, and while at it
>> > fill in the missing dithering bits since we already had some
>> > of them defined.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 18 +++++-----
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h              | 35 +++++++++++---------
>> >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > index 6073f94632ab..e293241450b1 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -3724,18 +3724,18 @@ static void bdw_set_pipemisc(const struct 
>> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> >  
>> >    switch (crtc_state->pipe_bpp) {
>> >    case 18:
>> > -          val |= PIPEMISC_6_BPC;
>> > +          val |= PIPEMISC_BPC_6;
>> >            break;
>> >    case 24:
>> > -          val |= PIPEMISC_8_BPC;
>> > +          val |= PIPEMISC_BPC_8;
>> >            break;
>> >    case 30:
>> > -          val |= PIPEMISC_10_BPC;
>> > +          val |= PIPEMISC_BPC_10;
>> >            break;
>> >    case 36:
>> >            /* Port output 12BPC defined for ADLP+ */
>> >            if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 12)
>> > -                  val |= PIPEMISC_12_BPC_ADLP;
>> > +                  val |= PIPEMISC_BPC_12_ADLP;
>> 
>> while on it, I wonder if we could remove this "ADLP" suffix.
>> 
>> First because prefix seems to be the most used case for the platform.
>
> I don't like prefix for such things since it screws up the namespace for
> the bits of the same register. So suffix is better IMO.

If we want to promote using suffix for platform specific registers or
contents, I guess we should record that in the i915_reg.h top
comment. Not that anyone reads it, but then we can nag it's there. :p

BR,
Jani.




>
>> But also because there's a clear if here and a clear comment in the 
>> definition.
>
> Yeah, I've been removing some similar things in other places for that exact
> reason. The only case where we might really need platform designators is
> when the bit(s) move etc.
>
> Though I was even pondering removing the 'if' since this only controls
> dithering on older platforms and we don't enable dithering for anything
> but 6bpc output. Although the whole pipe_bpp concept is kinda wrong and
> we should perhaps split it up into pipe_bpp vs. port_bpp, or something 
> along those lines.
>
>> (Btw, I'd prefer the ver >= 13 than > 12 to be really clear :/)
>
> Yeah, >= is what we should use.
>
>> 
>> >            break;
>> >    default:
>> >            MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->pipe_bpp);
>> > @@ -3771,7 +3771,7 @@ static void bdw_set_pipemisc(const struct 
>> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> >            }
>> >  
>> >            intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, PIPE_MISC2(crtc->pipe),
>> > -                       PIPE_MISC2_UNDERRUN_BUBBLE_COUNTER_MASK,
>> > +                       PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_MASK,
>> >                         scaler_in_use ? 
>> > PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_SCALER_EN :
>> >                         PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_SCALER_DIS);
>> >    }
>> > @@ -3787,11 +3787,11 @@ int bdw_get_pipemisc_bpp(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> >    tmp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PIPEMISC(crtc->pipe));
>> >  
>> >    switch (tmp & PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK) {
>> > -  case PIPEMISC_6_BPC:
>> > +  case PIPEMISC_BPC_6:
>> >            return 18;
>> > -  case PIPEMISC_8_BPC:
>> > +  case PIPEMISC_BPC_8:
>> >            return 24;
>> > -  case PIPEMISC_10_BPC:
>> > +  case PIPEMISC_BPC_10:
>> >            return 30;
>> >    /*
>> >     * PORT OUTPUT 12 BPC defined for ADLP+.
>> > @@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ int bdw_get_pipemisc_bpp(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> >     * on older platforms, need to find a workaround for 12 BPC
>> >     * MIPI DSI HW readout.
>> >     */
>> > -  case PIPEMISC_12_BPC_ADLP:
>> > +  case PIPEMISC_BPC_12_ADLP:
>> >            if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 12)
>> >                    return 36;
>> >            fallthrough;
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h 
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> > index f5d54ed2efc1..e300a202ce2d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> > @@ -6308,32 +6308,35 @@ enum {
>> >  
>> >  #define _PIPE_MISC_A                      0x70030
>> >  #define _PIPE_MISC_B                      0x71030
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_YUV420_ENABLE  (1 << 27) /* glk+ */
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_YUV420_MODE_FULL_BLEND (1 << 26) /* glk+ */
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_HDR_MODE_PRECISION     (1 << 23) /* icl+ */
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_COLORSPACE_YUV  (1 << 11)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_PIXEL_ROUNDING_TRUNC   REG_BIT(8) /* tgl+ */
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_YUV420_ENABLE          REG_BIT(27) /* glk+ */
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_YUV420_MODE_FULL_BLEND REG_BIT(26) /* glk+ */
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_HDR_MODE_PRECISION             REG_BIT(23) /* icl+ */
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_OUTPUT_COLORSPACE_YUV  REG_BIT(11)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_PIXEL_ROUNDING_TRUNC           REG_BIT(8) /* tgl+ */
>> >  /*
>> >   * For Display < 13, Bits 5-7 of PIPE MISC represent DITHER BPC with
>> >   * valid values of: 6, 8, 10 BPC.
>> >   * ADLP+, the bits 5-7 represent PORT OUTPUT BPC with valid values of:
>> >   * 6, 8, 10, 12 BPC.
>> >   */
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK               (7 << 5)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_8_BPC          (0 << 5)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_10_BPC         (1 << 5)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_6_BPC          (2 << 5)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_12_BPC_ADLP            (4 << 5) /* adlp+ */
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_ENABLE  (1 << 4)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK       (3 << 2)
>> > -#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_SP (0 << 2)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK                       REG_GENMASK(7, 5)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_8                  
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK, 0)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_10                 
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK, 1)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_6                  
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK, 2)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_BPC_12_ADLP                    
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_BPC_MASK, 4) /* adlp+ */
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_ENABLE          REG_BIT(4)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK               REG_GENMASK(3, 2)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_SP         
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK, 0)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_ST1                
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK, 1)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_ST2                
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK, 2)
>> > +#define   PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_TEMP               
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPEMISC_DITHER_TYPE_MASK, 3)
>> >  #define PIPEMISC(pipe)                    _MMIO_PIPE2(pipe, _PIPE_MISC_A)
>> >  
>> >  #define _PIPE_MISC2_A                                     0x7002C
>> >  #define _PIPE_MISC2_B                                     0x7102C
>> > -#define   PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_SCALER_EN             (0x50 << 24)
>> > -#define   PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_SCALER_DIS            (0x14 << 24)
>> > -#define   PIPE_MISC2_UNDERRUN_BUBBLE_COUNTER_MASK (0xff << 24)
>> > +#define   PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_MASK  REG_GENMASK(31, 24)
>> > +#define   PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_SCALER_EN     
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_MASK, 80)
>> > +#define   PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_SCALER_DIS    
>> > REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPE_MISC2_BUBBLE_COUNTER_MASK, 20)
>> >  #define PIPE_MISC2(pipe)                                  
>> > _MMIO_PIPE2(pipe, _PIPE_MISC2_A)
>> >  
>> >  /* Skylake+ pipe bottom (background) color */
>> > -- 
>> > 2.32.0
>> > 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to