On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct
tomoyo_io_buffer *head,
> case 3:
> if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO)
> tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s",
> - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log ==
> - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));
> + yesno(cond->grant_log ==
TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));
This would be better split on two lines.
Really? Yuck!
I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I
still see it as 80. But anyway...
Checking that: docs still say 80, but checkpatch was changed to warn
only on 100. Commit bdc48fa11e46 ("checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate
80-column warning") is clear why the discrepancy.
Lucas De Marchi
cond->grant_log ==
TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES
is not readable at all. Not compared to
cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES
I say keep it one line!
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rost...@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
Then,
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
