On 1/25/22 20:35, Robert Beckett wrote:
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
For local-memory objects we need to align the GTT addresses
to 64K, both for the ppgtt and ggtt.
We need to support vm->min_alignment > 4K, depending
on the vm itself and the type of object we are inserting.
With this in mind update the GTT selftests to take this
into account.
For compact-pt we further align and pad lmem object GTT addresses
to 2MB to ensure PDEs contain consistent page sizes as
required by the HW.
v3:
* use needs_compact_pt flag to discriminate between
64K and 64K with compact-pt
* add i915_vm_obj_min_alignment
* use i915_vm_obj_min_alignment to round up vma reservation
if compact-pt instead of hard coding
v5:
* fix i915_vm_obj_min_alignment for internal objects which
have no memory region
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <bob.beck...@collabora.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
.../i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c | 23 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c | 12 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h | 18 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 9 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 96 ++++++++++++-------
5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
index c8ff8bf0986d..f0bfce53258f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_client_blt.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct tiled_blits {
struct blit_buffer scratch;
struct i915_vma *batch;
u64 hole;
+ u64 align;
u32 width;
u32 height;
};
@@ -410,14 +411,21 @@ tiled_blits_create(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct
rnd_state *prng)
goto err_free;
}
- hole_size = 2 * PAGE_ALIGN(WIDTH * HEIGHT * 4);
+ t->align = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M; /* XXX worst case, derive from vm! */
+ t->align = max(t->align,
+ i915_vm_min_alignment(t->ce->vm, INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL));
+ t->align = max(t->align,
+ i915_vm_min_alignment(t->ce->vm, INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM));
Don't we always end up with 2M here, regardless of the vm restrictions?
