On Mon, 07 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 09:36:57PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Commit 80a8cecf62a5 ("drm/i915/dp_mst: Disable link training fallback on
>> MST links") disabled link training failure fallback for DP MST due to
>> the MST manager using the DPCD directly, and generally being ignorant
>> about the possibility of downgrading link parameters. See the commit for
>> further details.
>>
>> Since then, the max_lane_count and max_link_rate members have been added
>> to struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr in commit 98025a62cb00 ("drm/dp_mst:
>> Use Extended Base Receiver Capability DPCD space") and refined in
>> follow-up work.
>>
>> The members perhaps aren't intended for changing the parameters during
>> the lifetime of the manager, as they're supposed to be passed to
>> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(). However, the members are only ever used
>> in drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(), and there seems to be nothing to
>> prevent us from adjusting them *before* enabling MST. The wouldn't have
>> an effect if modified while MST is enabled. This is not necessarily
>> pretty, though.
>>
>> Cc: Nikola Cornij <nikola.cor...@amd.com>
>> Cc: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shan...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This is *untested*. I don't see why it wouldn't work, though...
>
> I don't think we have the required stuff to force a modeset on all
> the streams when the link params change.
Hmm, but this is done when the link training fails on the first stream.
> And the bad link status property + uevent stuff is only hooked up to
> the SST connector AFAICS.
Need to double check.
> The other major thing missing is a way to reduce the bpp/etc. of
> all the streams to make more room on the link if we have
> insufficient bandwidth. And the more we start to reduce the bw
> the more we're going to hit that and fail the modesets. We already
> ran into regressions due to this when I tried to enable deep color
> for MST.
The point here is to have a way to reduce the link to not have a black
screen when the link training fails, not so much to gracefully handle
insufficient bandwidth.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> this
>> should allow us to downgrade the link to from 128b/132b to 8b/10b if the
>> former fails.
>>
>> Thoughts? In particular, any objections for messing with the topology
>> manager members directly? Any chance it'll make refactoring the MST code
>> more difficult?
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 42 ++++++++++-----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 5 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index 619546441eae..2fad3104b40e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -600,15 +600,6 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct
>> intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> int index;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * TODO: Enable fallback on MST links once MST link compute can handle
>> - * the fallback params.
>> - */
>> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>> - drm_err(&i915->drm, "Link Training Unsuccessful\n");
>> - return -1;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && !intel_dp->use_max_params) {
>> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>> "Retrying Link training for eDP with max
>> parameters\n");
>> @@ -2785,6 +2776,8 @@ intel_dp_configure_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>> struct intel_encoder *encoder =
>> &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
>> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = &intel_dp->mst_mgr;
>> +
>> bool sink_can_mst = drm_dp_read_mst_cap(&intel_dp->aux, intel_dp->dpcd);
>>
>> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>> @@ -2800,8 +2793,17 @@ intel_dp_configure_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> intel_dp->is_mst = sink_can_mst &&
>> i915->params.enable_dp_mst;
>>
>> - drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
>> - intel_dp->is_mst);
>> + /*
>> + * Set the source max lane count and link rate using the possibly
>> + * limited values due to failed link training.
>> + *
>> + * This is a bit hackish, as the values are supposed to be passed to
>> + * drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init().
>> + */
>> + mgr->max_lane_count = intel_dp->max_link_lane_count;
>> + mgr->max_link_rate = intel_dp->max_link_rate;
>> +
>> + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(mgr, intel_dp->is_mst);
>> }
>>
>> static bool
>> @@ -4472,23 +4474,19 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - /* Read DP Sink DSC Cap DPCD regs for DP v1.4 */
>> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
>> - intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(intel_dp);
>> -
>> - intel_dp_configure_mst(intel_dp);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * TODO: Reset link params when switching to MST mode, until MST
>> - * supports link training fallback params.
>> - */
>> - if (intel_dp->reset_link_params || intel_dp->is_mst) {
>> + if (intel_dp->reset_link_params) {
>> intel_dp_reset_max_link_params(intel_dp);
>> intel_dp->reset_link_params = false;
>> }
>>
>> intel_dp_print_rates(intel_dp);
>>
>> + /* Read DP Sink DSC Cap DPCD regs for DP v1.4 */
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
>> + intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(intel_dp);
>> +
>> + intel_dp_configure_mst(intel_dp);
>> +
>> if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>> /*
>> * If we are in MST mode then this connector
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> index e30e698aa684..442dbd0ed201 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> @@ -151,8 +151,9 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct
>> intel_encoder *encoder,
>> intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_ON;
>>
>> /*
>> - * for MST we always configure max link bw - the spec doesn't
>> - * seem to suggest we should do otherwise.
>> + * For MST we always configure max link bw - the spec doesn't seem to
>> + * suggest we should do otherwise. The values may be reduced due to link
>> + * training failures, however.
>> */
>> limits.min_rate =
>> limits.max_rate = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
>> --
>> 2.30.2
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
