On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 02:26:20PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> From: CQ Tang <cq.t...@intel.com>
>
> On some systems lmem can be as large as 16G, which seems to trigger
> various CI timeouts, and in the best case just takes a long time. For
> the purposes of the test we should be able to limit to 4G, without any
> big loss in coverage.
>
> Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.t...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy....@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> index 995a663f..ad1c989c 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> @@ -526,7 +526,13 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler,
> NULL)
> igt_fixture {
> struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
>
> - i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
> + igt_i915_driver_unload();
> + if (igt_i915_driver_load("lmem_size=4096")) {
> + igt_debug("i915 missing lmem_size modparam support\n");
> + igt_assert_eq(igt_i915_driver_load(NULL), 0);
> + }
Does the driver load truly fail with an unknown param?
--
Petri Latvala
> +
> + i915 = __drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
> igt_require_gem(i915);
> igt_require(gem_has_lmem(i915));
>
> @@ -554,6 +560,7 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler,
> NULL)
> igt_fixture {
> free(regions);
> close(i915);
> + igt_i915_driver_unload();
> }
>
> igt_exit();
> --
> 2.34.1
>
