On Mon 02 May 15:49 PDT 2022, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:

> 
> On 5/2/2022 3:29 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 02 May 13:59 PDT 2022, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> > 
> > > On 5/2/2022 9:53 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > The Qualcomm DisplayPort driver contains traces of the necessary
> > > > plumbing to hook up USB HPD, in the form of the dp_hpd module and the
> > > > dp_usbpd_cb struct. Use this as basis for implementing the
> > > > hpd_notify() callback, by amending the dp_hpd module with the
> > > > missing logic.
> > > > 
> > > > Overall the solution is similar to what's done downstream, but upstream
> > > > all the code to disect the HPD notification lives on the calling side of
> > > > drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event().
> > > > 
> > > > drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event() performs the lookup of the
> > > > drm_connector based on fwnode, hence the need to assign the fwnode in
> > > > dp_drm_connector_init().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > - Implements hpd_notify instead of oob_hotplug_event
> > > > - Rebased on new cleanup patch from Dmitry
> > > > - Set hpd_state to ST_MAINLINK_READY when dp_display_usbpd_configure() 
> > > > succeeds
> > > > 
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h |  1 +
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c     |  3 +++
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.h     |  2 ++
> > > >    4 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > > index b447446d75e9..080294ac6144 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > > @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct dp_display_private {
> > > >         bool hpd_irq_on;
> > > >         bool audio_supported;
> > > > +       bool connected;
> > > > +
> > > >         struct drm_device *drm_dev;
> > > >         struct platform_device *pdev;
> > > >         struct dentry *root;
> > > > @@ -1271,6 +1273,7 @@ static int dp_display_probe(struct 
> > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > >         if (!desc)
> > > >                 return -EINVAL;
> > > > +       dp->dp_display.dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > >         dp->pdev = pdev;
> > > >         dp->name = "drm_dp";
> > > >         dp->dp_display.connector_type = desc->connector_type;
> > > > @@ -1760,3 +1763,26 @@ void dp_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge 
> > > > *drm_bridge,
> > > >         dp_display->dp_mode.h_active_low =
> > > >                 !!(dp_display->dp_mode.drm_mode.flags & 
> > > > DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC);
> > > >    }
> > > > +
> > > > +void dp_bridge_hpd_notify(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > > > +                         enum drm_connector_status status)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct msm_dp_bridge *dp_bridge = to_dp_bridge(bridge);
> > > > +       struct msm_dp *dp = dp_bridge->dp_display;
> > > > +       struct dp_display_private *dp_display = container_of(dp, struct 
> > > > dp_display_private, dp_display);
> > > > +       int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +       drm_dbg_dp(dp_display->drm_dev, "status: %d connected: %d\n", 
> > > > status, dp_display->connected);
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (!dp_display->connected && status == 
> > > > connector_status_connected) {
> > > > +               dp_display->connected = true;
> > > > +               ret = dp_display_usbpd_configure(dp_display);
> > > > +               if (!ret)
> > > > +                       dp_display->hpd_state = ST_MAINLINK_READY;
> > > > +       } else if (status != connector_status_connected) {
> > > > +               dp_display->connected = false;
> > > > +               dp_display_notify_disconnect(dp_display);
> > > > +       } else {
> > > > +               dp_display_usbpd_attention(dp_display);
> > > > +       }
> > > > +}
> > > I would assume dp_bridge_hpd_notify() will server same purpose as
> > > dp_display_irq_handler() if hpd_notification is enabled.
> > > 
> > I agree with this statement.
> > 
> > > In that case, should dp_bridge_hpd_notify() add
> > > EV_HPD_PLUG_INT/EV_IRQ_HPD_INT/EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT
> > > 
> > I tried this originally, but couldn't get it to work and expected that
> > as the downstream driver doesn't do this, there was some good reason for
> > me not to do it either.
> > 
> > > into event q to kick off corresponding
> > > dp_hpd_plug_handle()/dp_irq_hpd_handle()/dp_hpd_unplug_handle()?
> > > 
> > But since then the driver has been cleaned up significantly, so I
> > decided to give it a test again.
> > Unfortunately it still doesn't work, but now it's easier to trace.
> > 
> > Replacing the 3 cases with relevant calls to dp_add_event() results in
> > us inserting a EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT event really early, before things has
> > been brought up. This will result in dp_hpd_unplug_handle() trying to
> > disable the dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(), which will crash as the
> > hardware isn't yet clocked up.
> > 
> > Further more, this points out the main difference between the normal HPD
> > code and the USB HPD code; dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr() will enable the
> > plug/unplug interrupts, which it shouldn't do for USB-controlled.
> > 
> > 
> > So it seems we need two code paths after all.
> > 
> > > By the way, I am going to test this patch out.
> > > 
> > > Any patches I have to pull in before apply this serial patches?
> > > 
> > The patches applies on Dmitry's msm-next-staging, which I've merged on
> > top of linux-next together with a number of pending patches to get the
> > DPU up on SM8350 and a pmic_glink driver which I'm about to post.
> > 
> > But to validate that it doesn't affect your non-USB case, Dmitry's
> > branch should be sufficient.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bjorn
> 
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> Which release image you had flashed?
> 
> I have ChromeOS-test-R100-14526.69.0-trogdor.tar flashed.
> 
> 1) Is this will work?
> 
> 2) how about EC? do I need to upgrade EC image?
> 

I'm not aware of the state of EC firmware for Trogdor for invoking the
USB Type-C code path. As of today Trogdor relies on the EC signalling
HPD using a GPIO.

I'm testing this on SM8350 and SC8180X using pmic_glink. Also, going
forward we will have to continue supporting both hardware IRQ and this
oob based HPD interrupts (as both combinations are valid).

Regards,
Bjorn

> Thanks,
> 
> kuogee
> 
> 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> > > > index 4f9fe4d7610b..2d2614bc5a14 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > > >    #include "disp/msm_disp_snapshot.h"
> > > >    struct msm_dp {
> > > > +       struct device *dev;
> > > >         struct drm_device *drm_dev;
> > > >         struct device *codec_dev;
> > > >         struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> > > > index 62d58b9c4647..821cfd37b1fb 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> > > > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs dp_bridge_ops = {
> > > >         .mode_valid   = dp_bridge_mode_valid,
> > > >         .get_modes    = dp_bridge_get_modes,
> > > >         .detect       = dp_bridge_detect,
> > > > +       .hpd_notify   = dp_bridge_hpd_notify,
> > > >    };
> > > >    struct drm_bridge *dp_bridge_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct 
> > > > drm_device *dev,
> > > > @@ -138,6 +139,8 @@ struct drm_connector *dp_drm_connector_init(struct 
> > > > msm_dp *dp_display)
> > > >         if (IS_ERR(connector))
> > > >                 return connector;
> > > > +       connector->fwnode = 
> > > > fwnode_handle_get(dev_fwnode(dp_display->dev));
> > > > +
> > > >         drm_connector_attach_encoder(connector, dp_display->encoder);
> > > >         return connector;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.h 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.h
> > > > index f4b1ed1e24f7..3b7480a86844 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.h
> > > > @@ -32,5 +32,7 @@ enum drm_mode_status dp_bridge_mode_valid(struct 
> > > > drm_bridge *bridge,
> > > >    void dp_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> > > >                         const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > > >                         const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode);
> > > > +void dp_bridge_hpd_notify(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > > > +                         enum drm_connector_status status);
> > > >    #endif /* _DP_DRM_H_ */

Reply via email to