On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:32:25 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> @@ -208,12 +232,14 @@ static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc
> *slpc, u32 freq)
> */
>
> with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
> - ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
> - SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> - freq);
> + /* Non-blocking request will avoid stalls */
> + ret = slpc_set_param_nb(slpc,
> +
> SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> + freq);
> if (ret)
> - i915_probe_error(i915, "Unable to force min freq to %u:
> %d",
> - freq, ret);
> + drm_notice(&i915->drm,
> + "Failed to send set_param for min freq(%d):
> (%d)\n",
> + freq, ret);
I am still thinking if we should replace drm_notice() by i915_probe_error()
since drm_notice() will basically hide any issues of boost/de-boost's
getting dropped.
Another idea here might be to maintain a counter, say "slpc->failed_boosts"
which we increment each time slpc_set_param_nb() fails and dump that
counter via intel_guc_slpc_print_info().
Anyway for now this is:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.di...@intel.com>
