On 25/07/2022 19:38, Srivatsa, Anusha wrote:
@Ursulin, Tvrtko Is this wat you had in mind?

Two functions aligned in prototype yes - but I left to you guys which prototype is correct. AFAICT Matt looked and concluded i915 is correct so that's good for me.

Regards,

Tvrtko

-----Original Message-----
From: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2022 3:51 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>; Ursulin, Tvrtko
<tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
<matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pass drm_i915_private struct instead of gt for
gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler/ack()

gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler() and gen11_gu_misc_ack() do nothing tile
specific.

v2: gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack() tile agnostic like gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler()
(Tvrtko)

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 16 ++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 73cebc6aa650..eb37b6bacaac
100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -2653,9 +2653,9 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_irq_handler(int irq, void
*arg)  }

  static u32
-gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(struct intel_gt *gt, const u32 master_ctl)
+gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const u32
+master_ctl)
  {
-       void __iomem * const regs = gt->uncore->regs;
+       void __iomem * const regs = i915->uncore.regs;
        u32 iir;

        if (!(master_ctl & GEN11_GU_MISC_IRQ)) @@ -2669,10 +2669,10
@@ gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(struct intel_gt *gt, const u32 master_ctl)  }

  static void
-gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(struct intel_gt *gt, const u32 iir)
+gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const u32 iir)
  {
        if (iir & GEN11_GU_MISC_GSE)
-               intel_opregion_asle_intr(gt->i915);
+               intel_opregion_asle_intr(i915);
  }

  static inline u32 gen11_master_intr_disable(void __iomem * const regs) @@
-2736,11 +2736,11 @@ static irqreturn_t gen11_irq_handler(int irq, void
*arg)
        if (master_ctl & GEN11_DISPLAY_IRQ)
                gen11_display_irq_handler(i915);

-       gu_misc_iir = gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(gt, master_ctl);
+       gu_misc_iir = gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(i915, master_ctl);

        gen11_master_intr_enable(regs);

-       gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(gt, gu_misc_iir);
+       gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(i915, gu_misc_iir);

        pmu_irq_stats(i915, IRQ_HANDLED);

@@ -2801,11 +2801,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dg1_irq_handler(int irq, void
*arg)
        if (master_ctl & GEN11_DISPLAY_IRQ)
                gen11_display_irq_handler(i915);

-       gu_misc_iir = gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(gt, master_ctl);
+       gu_misc_iir = gen11_gu_misc_irq_ack(i915, master_ctl);

        dg1_master_intr_enable(regs);

-       gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(gt, gu_misc_iir);
+       gen11_gu_misc_irq_handler(i915, gu_misc_iir);

        pmu_irq_stats(i915, IRQ_HANDLED);

--
2.25.1

Reply via email to