On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:07:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
Move display related members under drm_i915_private display sub-struct.
Prefer adding anonymous sub-structs even for single members that aren't
our own structs.
Abstract mmio base member access in register definitions in a macro.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 5 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h | 188 +++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 -
4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
index 533c2e3a6685..db1ba379797e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
@@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ struct intel_display {
unsigned int max_cdclk_freq;
} cdclk;
+ struct {
+ /* VLV/CHV/BXT/GLK DSI MMIO register base address */
this is already outdated, so maybe remove the platforms from the
comment?
+ u32 mmio_base;
+ } dsi;
+
struct {
/* list of fbdev register on this device */
struct intel_fbdev *fbdev;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
index b9b1fed99874..9651a1f00587 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c
@@ -1872,9 +1872,9 @@ void vlv_dsi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return;
if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
- dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base = BXT_MIPI_BASE;
+ dev_priv->display.dsi.mmio_base = BXT_MIPI_BASE;
else
- dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base = VLV_MIPI_BASE;
+ dev_priv->display.dsi.mmio_base = VLV_MIPI_BASE;
intel_dsi = kzalloc(sizeof(*intel_dsi), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!intel_dsi)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
index 356e51515346..e065b8f2ee08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_regs.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#define VLV_MIPI_BASE VLV_DISPLAY_BASE
#define BXT_MIPI_BASE 0x60000
+#define _MIPI_MMIO_BASE(__i915) ((__i915)->display.dsi.mmio_base)
+
#define _MIPI_PORT(port, a, c) (((port) == PORT_A) ? a : c) /* ports A and
C only */
#define _MMIO_MIPI(port, a, c) _MMIO(_MIPI_PORT(port, a, c))
@@ -96,8 +98,8 @@
/* MIPI DSI Controller and D-PHY registers */
-#define _MIPIA_DEVICE_READY (dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base + 0xb000)
-#define _MIPIC_DEVICE_READY (dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base + 0xb800)
+#define _MIPIA_DEVICE_READY (_MIPI_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0xb000)
ugh, and I thought we wouldn't have so many implicit params anymore.
Mind adding a "TODO: remove implicit dev_priv parameter" ?
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
Lucas De Marchi
