On Mon, 08 Aug 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.mur...@intel.com> wrote:
> The patch with commit 20f85ef89d94 ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique
> backlight device names") already adds support for dual panel backlight
> but with error prints. Since the patch tried to create the backlight
> device with the same name and upon failure will try with a different
> name it leads to failure logs in dmesg inturn getting caught by CI.
>
> This patch alternately will check if the backlight class of same name
> exists, will use a different name.

Thanks for the patch, pushed to drm-intel-next.

I took the liberty of rewriting the commit message a bit while pushing.

BR,
Jani.


>
> v2: reworked on top of the patch commit 20f85ef89d94
> ("drm/i915/backlight: use unique backlight device names")
> v3: fixed the ref count leak(Jani N)
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.mur...@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c    | 26 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> index 110fc98ec280..931446413372 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c
> @@ -971,26 +971,24 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct 
> intel_connector *connector)
>       if (!name)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -     bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
> -                                    &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Using the same name independent of the drm device or connector
> -      * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
> -      * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
> -      * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight devices as a
> -      * fallback when the default name already exists.
> -      */
> -     if (IS_ERR(bd) && PTR_ERR(bd) == -EEXIST) {
> +     bd = backlight_device_get_by_name(name);
> +     if (bd) {
> +             put_device(&bd->dev);
> +             /*
> +              * Using the same name independent of the drm device or 
> connector
> +              * prevents registration of multiple backlight devices in the
> +              * driver. However, we need to use the default name for backward
> +              * compatibility. Use unique names for subsequent backlight 
> devices as a
> +              * fallback when the default name already exists.
> +              */
>               kfree(name);
>               name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "card%d-%s-backlight",
>                                i915->drm.primary->index, 
> connector->base.name);
>               if (!name)
>                       return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -             bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, 
> connector,
> -                                            &intel_backlight_device_ops, 
> &props);
>       }
> +     bd = backlight_device_register(name, connector->base.kdev, connector,
> +                                    &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
>  
>       if (IS_ERR(bd)) {
>               drm_err(&i915->drm,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to