On 30.08.2022 11:34, Jani Nikula wrote:
Avoid BUG_ON(). Actually check the dpll count and bail out loudly with
drm_WARN_ON() from the loop before overflowing
i915->dpll.shared_dplls[].
v2: Rebase
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index bbe142056c7c..ed267c918009 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -4199,6 +4199,10 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
dpll_info = dpll_mgr->dpll_info;
for (i = 0; dpll_info[i].name; i++) {
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
+ i >=
ARRAY_SIZE(dev_priv->display.dpll.shared_dplls)))
+ break;
+
Shouldn't this check be replaced by some compile time checker.
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.ha...@intel.com>
Regards
Andrzej
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, i != dpll_info[i].id);
dev_priv->display.dpll.shared_dplls[i].info = &dpll_info[i];
}
@@ -4206,8 +4210,6 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
dev_priv->display.dpll.mgr = dpll_mgr;
dev_priv->display.dpll.num_shared_dpll = i;
mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.dpll.lock);
-
- BUG_ON(dev_priv->display.dpll.num_shared_dpll > I915_NUM_PLLS);
}
/**
