On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:26:17PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:58:08PM -0400, Kumar Valsan, Prathap wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:53:40AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 16/09/2022 02:43, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > > Although the bspec lists several MMIO ranges as "MSLICE," it turns out
> > > > > that a subset of these are of a "GAM" subclass that has unique rules 
> > > > > and
> > > > > doesn't followed regular mslice steering behavior.
> > > > > 
> > > > >   * Xe_HP SDV:  GAM ranges must always be steered to 0,0.  These
> > > > >     registers share the regular steering control register (0xFDC) with
> > > > >     other steering types
> > > > > 
> > > > >   * DG2:  GAM ranges must always be steered to 1,0.  GAM registers 
> > > > > have a
> > > > >     dedicated steering control register (0xFE0) so we can set the 
> > > > > value
> > > > >     once at startup and rely on implicit steering.  Technically the
> > > > >     hardware default should already be set to 1,0 properly, but it 
> > > > > never
> > > > >     hurts to ensure that in the driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you have any data on whether the "technically should" holds in 
> > > > practice?
> > > > What would be the consequences of some platform/machine surprising us 
> > > > here?
> > > 
> > > The bspec indicates the hardware default value is already the necessary
> > > 1,0 value; I'm mostly paranoid about some kind of boot firmware wiping
> > > it to 0,0 by accident.  I don't have any evidence that has ever actually
> > > happened, but explicitly re-programming it to 1,0 in the patch here is a
> > > defensive measure just to be safe.
> > > 
> > > If we didn't have this patch _and_ some firmware screwed up the GAM
> > > steering target, then presumably we might read back garbage or 0 from
> > > GAM registers in places where we should have received a real value.
> > Will firmware ever touch the steering target registers. As i was going
> > through the respective hsd. The software driver impact is marked as none
> > so wondering if this change is really required ?
> 
> The GAM only has a dedicated steering register on DG2; on XEHPSDV it
> shares 0xFDC with all the other kinds of steering, so it is important to
> handle this range independently of the MSLICE range and make sure we
> properly re-steer GAM accesses to the primary instance (and not just any
> random MSLICE) there.
Ok. I missed that part.
> 
> On DG2, if we assume firmware behaves properly, the dedicated steering
> register is initialized properly and we don't need to explicitly
> re-steer.  However this patch will ensure that we don't needlessly
> re-program 0xFDC according to MSLICE rules when accessing a GAM
> register.
> 
> There's also the worry that firmware may try to "sanitize" the registers
> at startup by programming them to what it thinks are appropriate default
> values.  Given that DG2's primary GAM is unusual (instance 1, instead of
> instance 0 as on other platforms), this feels like a place where
> firmware bugs could creep in.  They hopefully/probably won't, but
> ensuring we forcefully initialize 0xFE0 to the proper value just ensures
> that we don't even have to worry about it.
Got it.
> 
> Finally, splitting the GAM from MSLICE ensures we get more accurate
> debug messages from the drm_printer in dmesg and debugfs.
> 
Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.val...@intel.com>
> 
> Matt
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Prathap
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Matt
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Tvrtko
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bspec: 66534
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c      | 24 
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h     |  1 +
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h    |  1 +
> > > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 10 +++++++++
> > > > >   4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c 
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> > > > > index e79405a45312..a2047a68ea7a 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_mcr.c
> > > > > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const char * const intel_steering_types[] = {
> > > > >       "L3BANK",
> > > > >       "MSLICE",
> > > > >       "LNCF",
> > > > > +     "GAM",
> > > > >       "INSTANCE 0",
> > > > >   };
> > > > > @@ -48,14 +49,23 @@ static const struct intel_mmio_range 
> > > > > icl_l3bank_steering_table[] = {
> > > > >       {},
> > > > >   };
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * Although the bspec lists more "MSLICE" ranges than shown here, 
> > > > > some of those
> > > > > + * are of a "GAM" subclass that has special rules.  Thus we use a 
> > > > > separate
> > > > > + * GAM table farther down for those.
> > > > > + */
> > > > >   static const struct intel_mmio_range 
> > > > > xehpsdv_mslice_steering_table[] = {
> > > > > -     { 0x004000, 0x004AFF },
> > > > > -     { 0x00C800, 0x00CFFF },
> > > > >       { 0x00DD00, 0x00DDFF },
> > > > >       { 0x00E900, 0x00FFFF }, /* 0xEA00 - OxEFFF is unused */
> > > > >       {},
> > > > >   };
> > > > > +static const struct intel_mmio_range xehpsdv_gam_steering_table[] = {
> > > > > +     { 0x004000, 0x004AFF },
> > > > > +     { 0x00C800, 0x00CFFF },
> > > > > +     {},
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > >   static const struct intel_mmio_range xehpsdv_lncf_steering_table[] 
> > > > > = {
> > > > >       { 0x00B000, 0x00B0FF },
> > > > >       { 0x00D800, 0x00D8FF },
> > > > > @@ -114,9 +124,15 @@ void intel_gt_mcr_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > > > >       } else if (IS_DG2(i915)) {
> > > > >               gt->steering_table[MSLICE] = 
> > > > > xehpsdv_mslice_steering_table;
> > > > >               gt->steering_table[LNCF] = dg2_lncf_steering_table;
> > > > > +             /*
> > > > > +              * No need to hook up the GAM table since it has a 
> > > > > dedicated
> > > > > +              * steering control register on DG2 and can use implicit
> > > > > +              * steering.
> > > > > +              */
> > > > >       } else if (IS_XEHPSDV(i915)) {
> > > > >               gt->steering_table[MSLICE] = 
> > > > > xehpsdv_mslice_steering_table;
> > > > >               gt->steering_table[LNCF] = xehpsdv_lncf_steering_table;
> > > > > +             gt->steering_table[GAM] = xehpsdv_gam_steering_table;
> > > > >       } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 11 &&
> > > > >                  GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) < IP_VER(12, 50)) {
> > > > >               gt->steering_table[L3BANK] = icl_l3bank_steering_table;
> > > > > @@ -351,6 +367,10 @@ static void get_nonterminated_steering(struct 
> > > > > intel_gt *gt,
> > > > >               *group = __ffs(gt->info.mslice_mask) << 1;
> > > > >               *instance = 0;  /* unused */
> > > > >               break;
> > > > > +     case GAM:
> > > > > +             *group = IS_DG2(gt->i915) ? 1 : 0;
> > > > > +             *instance = 0;
> > > > > +             break;
> > > > >       case INSTANCE0:
> > > > >               /*
> > > > >                * There are a lot of MCR types for which instance (0, 
> > > > > 0)
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h 
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > > > > index 2275ee47da95..2343b26e0e21 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > > > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > > > >   #define MCFG_MCR_SELECTOR                   _MMIO(0xfd0)
> > > > >   #define SF_MCR_SELECTOR                             _MMIO(0xfd8)
> > > > >   #define GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR                   _MMIO(0xfdc)
> > > > > +#define GAM_MCR_SELECTOR                     _MMIO(0xfe0)
> > > > >   #define   GEN8_MCR_SLICE(slice)                     (((slice) & 3) 
> > > > > << 26)
> > > > >   #define   GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK                       
> > > > > GEN8_MCR_SLICE(3)
> > > > >   #define   GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice)               (((subslice) & 
> > > > > 3) << 24)
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h 
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> > > > > index f19c2de77ff6..30003d68fd51 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> > > > > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum intel_steering_type {
> > > > >       L3BANK,
> > > > >       MSLICE,
> > > > >       LNCF,
> > > > > +     GAM,
> > > > >       /*
> > > > >        * On some platforms there are multiple types of MCR registers 
> > > > > that
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c 
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > > > > index 6d2003d598e6..d04652a3b4e5 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> > > > > @@ -1181,6 +1181,9 @@ xehp_init_mcr(struct intel_gt *gt, struct 
> > > > > i915_wa_list *wal)
> > > > >               gt->steering_table[MSLICE] = NULL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > > +     if (IS_XEHPSDV(gt->i915) && slice_mask & BIT(0))
> > > > > +             gt->steering_table[GAM] = NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > >       slice = __ffs(slice_mask);
> > > > >       subslice = intel_sseu_find_first_xehp_dss(sseu, 
> > > > > GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE, slice) %
> > > > >               GEN_DSS_PER_GSLICE;
> > > > > @@ -1198,6 +1201,13 @@ xehp_init_mcr(struct intel_gt *gt, struct 
> > > > > i915_wa_list *wal)
> > > > >        */
> > > > >       __set_mcr_steering(wal, MCFG_MCR_SELECTOR, 0, 2);
> > > > >       __set_mcr_steering(wal, SF_MCR_SELECTOR, 0, 2);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     /*
> > > > > +      * On DG2, GAM registers have a dedicated steering control 
> > > > > register
> > > > > +      * and must always be programmed to a hardcoded groupid of "1."
> > > > > +      */
> > > > > +     if (IS_DG2(gt->i915))
> > > > > +             __set_mcr_steering(wal, GAM_MCR_SELECTOR, 1, 0);
> > > > >   }
> > > > >   static void
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Matt Roper
> > > Graphics Software Engineer
> > > VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
> > > Intel Corporation
> 
> -- 
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
> Intel Corporation

Reply via email to