On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> intel_color_init() does both device level and crtc level stuff.
>> Split it up accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c   | 15 +++++++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h   |  4 +++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c    |  3 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  1 +
>>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> index bbc56affb3ec..ddfe7c257a72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> @@ -2206,13 +2206,21 @@ static const struct intel_color_funcs 
>> ilk_color_funcs = {
>>      .read_luts = ilk_read_luts,
>>  };
>>  
>> -void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> +void intel_crtc_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>  {
>>      struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>      bool has_ctm = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.degamma_lut_size != 
>> 0;
>>  
>>      drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&crtc->base, 256);
>>  
>> +    drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(&crtc->base,
>> +                               
>> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.degamma_lut_size,
>> +                               has_ctm,
>> +                               
>> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.gamma_lut_size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_color_init_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>>      if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>>              if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>>                      dev_priv->display.funcs.color = &chv_color_funcs;
>> @@ -2238,9 +2246,4 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>              } else
>>                      dev_priv->display.funcs.color = &ilk_color_funcs;
>>      }
>> -
>> -    drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(&crtc->base,
>> -                               
>> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.degamma_lut_size,
>> -                               has_ctm,
>> -                               
>> INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.color.gamma_lut_size);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>> index fd873425e082..67702451e2fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>> @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@
>>  
>>  struct intel_crtc_state;
>>  struct intel_crtc;
>> +struct drm_i915_private;
>>  struct drm_property_blob;
>>  
>> -void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> +void intel_color_init_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +void intel_crtc_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>>  int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  void intel_color_commit_noarm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  void intel_color_commit_arm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
>> index 6792a9056f46..2d9fc7383bfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
>> @@ -365,8 +365,7 @@ int intel_crtc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, 
>> enum pipe pipe)
>>                                              BIT(DRM_SCALING_FILTER_DEFAULT) 
>> |
>>                                              
>> BIT(DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR));
>>  
>> -    intel_color_init(crtc);
>> -
>> +    intel_crtc_color_init(crtc);
>>      intel_crtc_drrs_init(crtc);
>>      intel_crtc_crc_init(crtc);
>
> I'd name all of these like:
>
>       intel_color_crtc_init();
>         intel_drrs_crtc_init();
>         intel_crc_crtc_init();
>
> I think in gem side the "name functions based on first/context argument"
> style has lead to serious problems wrt code organization. They still
> stick to it, but I can't make heads or tails where function definitions
> or declarations are supposed to be placed or found.

The patch itself is fine, and follows the precedent set by the above
functions, but I'd *really* like to see all the above functions renamed
afterwards.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index eb8eaeb19881..a103413cb081 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -8326,6 +8326,7 @@ void intel_init_display_hooks(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *dev_priv)
>>      if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>>              return;
>>  
>> +    intel_color_init_hooks(dev_priv);
>>      intel_init_cdclk_hooks(dev_priv);
>>      intel_audio_hooks_init(dev_priv);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to