Hi,
I peeked inside from curiosity and was pleasantly surprise to see
kthread_work is used! Some comments below.
On 28/10/2022 10:50, Riana Tauro wrote:
Run a workload on tiles simultaneously by requesting for RP0 frequency.
Pcode can however limit the frequency being granted due to throttling
reasons. This test fails if there is any throttling
v2: Fix build error
Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.ta...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
index 82ec95a299f6..d19486772f5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@ enum test_type {
VARY_MAX,
MAX_GRANTED,
SLPC_POWER,
+ TILE_INTERACTION,
+};
+
+struct slpc_thread {
+ struct kthread_worker *worker;
+ struct kthread_work work;
+ struct intel_gt *gt;
+ int result;
};
static int slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
@@ -310,6 +318,7 @@ static int run_test(struct intel_gt *gt, int test_type)
break;
case MAX_GRANTED:
+ case TILE_INTERACTION:
/* Media engines have a different RP0 */
if (engine->class == VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS ||
engine->class == VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS) {
@@ -325,6 +334,7 @@ static int run_test(struct intel_gt *gt, int test_type)
case SLPC_POWER:
err = slpc_power(gt, engine);
break;
+
Noise.
}
if (test_type != SLPC_POWER) {
@@ -426,6 +436,58 @@ static int live_slpc_power(void *arg)
return ret;
}
+static void slpc_spinner_thread(struct kthread_work *work)
+{
+ struct slpc_thread *thread = container_of(work, typeof(*thread), work);
+
+ thread->result = run_test(thread->gt, TILE_INTERACTION);
+}
+
+static int live_slpc_tile_interaction(void *arg)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
+ struct intel_gt *gt;
+ struct slpc_thread *threads;
+ int i = 0, ret = 0;
+
+ threads = kcalloc(I915_MAX_GT, sizeof(*threads), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!threads)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
+ pr_info("Running on GT: %d\n", gt->info.id);
Not sure logging these makes sense since test runs on all tiles in
parallel anyway.
+ threads[i].worker = kthread_create_worker(0,
"igt/slpc_parallel:%d", gt->info.id);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(threads[i].worker)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(threads[i].worker);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ threads[i].gt = gt;
+ threads[i].result = 0;
No need to zero result due kcalloc and runs do not repeat.
+ kthread_init_work(&threads[i].work, slpc_spinner_thread);
+ kthread_queue_work(threads[i].worker, &threads[i].work);
+ }
+
+ for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
+ int status;
+
+ if (!threads[i].worker)
+ continue;
Could be ERR_PTR by the look of it so it would crash below. Either gate
on threads[i].gt or use IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
Regards,
Tvrtko
+
+ kthread_flush_work(&threads[i].work);
+ status = READ_ONCE(threads[i].result);
+ if (status && !ret) {
+ pr_err("%s GT %d failed ", __func__, gt->info.id);
+ ret = status;
+ }
+ kthread_destroy_worker(threads[i].worker);
+ }
+
+ kfree(threads);
+ return ret;
+}
+
int intel_slpc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
@@ -433,6 +495,7 @@ int intel_slpc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
SUBTEST(live_slpc_vary_min),
SUBTEST(live_slpc_max_granted),
SUBTEST(live_slpc_power),
+ SUBTEST(live_slpc_tile_interaction),
};
struct intel_gt *gt;
