On 12/06/2013 12:54 AM, Xiang, Haihao wrote: > From: "Xiang, Haihao" <haihao.xi...@intel.com> > > Otherwise the stale data in the buffer > > Signed-off-by: Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xi...@intel.com> > --- > lib/intel_batchbuffer.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c > index 06a5437..9ce7424 100644 > --- a/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c > +++ b/lib/intel_batchbuffer.c > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ intel_batchbuffer_reset(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch) > batch->bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(batch->bufmgr, "batchbuffer", > BATCH_SZ, 4096); > > + memset(batch->buffer, 0, sizeof(batch->buffer)); > + > batch->ptr = batch->buffer; > } > >
I don't think that should be harmful, but this would definitely make debugging nicer. For intel-gpu-tools, I think it makes sense. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
