On 11/2/22 11:01 AM, Eric Farman wrote:
> Now that we have a reasonable separation of structs that follow
> the subchannel and mdev lifecycles, there's no reason we can't
> call the official vfio_alloc_device routine for our private data,
> and behave like everyone else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <far...@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 18 ------------------
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 2 --
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 10 +++++-----
> include/linux/vfio.h | 2 --
> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> index 041cc0860f0e..fd58c0f4f8cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> @@ -151,24 +151,6 @@ static void vfio_ccw_sch_irq(struct subchannel *sch)
> vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_INTERRUPT);
> }
>
> -void vfio_ccw_free_private(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
> -{
> - struct vfio_ccw_crw *crw, *temp;
> -
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(crw, temp, &private->crw, next) {
> - list_del(&crw->next);
> - kfree(crw);
> - }
> -
> - kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_crw_region, private->crw_region);
> - kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_schib_region, private->schib_region);
> - kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
> - kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
> - kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
> - mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
> - kfree(private);
> -}
> -
> static void vfio_ccw_free_parent(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct vfio_ccw_parent *parent = container_of(dev, struct
> vfio_ccw_parent, dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> index 8a929a9cf3c6..1155f8bcedd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
> @@ -102,15 +102,10 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
> int ret;
>
> - private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!private)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - ret = vfio_init_device(&private->vdev, &mdev->dev, &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
> - if (ret) {
> - kfree(private);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + private = vfio_alloc_device(vfio_ccw_private, vdev, &mdev->dev,
> + &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(private))
> + return PTR_ERR(private);
OK, and now it makes sense to switch to IS_ERR since _vfio_alloc_device uses
ERR_PTR.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com>
