On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 08:46:00PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:00:11AM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > Actually, could you please address the checkpatch issues before we can 
> > > > push?
> > > > Sorry about that, but just noticed now when I was going to push the 
> > > > other ones.
> > > 
> > > Hello Rodrigo,
> > > The checkpatch warning is associated with the long "make coccicheck ..." 
> > > command
> > > in the commit message. It is not part of the code, so is should not be 
> > > carried
> > > forward into the code base.
> > > If you still want me to correct it, I will need to split it into two 
> > > lines which
> > > I think still violates the commit description guidelines.
> > 
> > This part I would just ignore or fix myself while merging. But the next one 
> > about
> > the parenthesis alignment need to be fixed in the code so we need another 
> > version.
> > Since we try to avoid touching the code between CI and merge.
> 
> I am sorry, but I am unable to locate the "second checkpatch complaint" you 
> are
> referring to. I have received only the following from the checkpatch robot:
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Error: dim checkpatch failed
> 4c95e9b71212 drm/i915/gvt: Avoid full proxy f_ops for scan_nonprivbb debug 
> attributes
> -:21: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description 
> (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> #21:
> make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=patch 
> COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
> 
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 22 lines checked
> 33d68a01cad3 drm/i915/gvt: Avoid full proxy f_ops for vgpu_status debug 
> attributes
> -:21: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description 
> (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> #21:
> make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=patch 
> COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
> 
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 18 lines checked
> 

doh, my bad! this gvt patch is indeed right. up to gvt folks to modify this line
when merging or to ignore...

The problem I mentioned was in the other series. Sorry for the noise.

but for the record:

-:47: CHECK:PARENTHESIS_ALIGNMENT: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#47: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_drrs.c:386:
+       debugfs_create_file_unsafe("i915_drrs_ctl", 0644, 
crtc->base.debugfs_entry,
+                                   crtc, &intel_drrs_debugfs_ctl_fops);


> ===============================
> 
> > 
> > Then, since you need to change that, while changing that, also please break
> > the coccinelle line in the commit msg.
> > 
> > I'd appreciate to have the patch for the pxp as well :)
> 
> Sure. As mentioned in the other thread, I am looking into it and would submit 
> a
> patch accordingly.
> 
> Thank you,
> ./drv
> 
> > 
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Rodrigo.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Let me know what you think.
> > > 
> > > Thank you,
> > > ./drv
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 6 +++---
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c 
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> > > > > > index 03f081c3d9a4..baccbf1761b7 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> > > > > > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int vgpu_status_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> > > > > >     return 0;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_status_fops, vgpu_status_get, NULL, 
> > > > > > "0x%llx\n");
> > > > > > +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_status_fops, vgpu_status_get, NULL, 
> > > > > > "0x%llx\n");
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  /**
> > > > > >   * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
> > > > > > @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct 
> > > > > > intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> > > > > >                         &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
> > > > > >     debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, 
> > > > > > vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> > > > > >                                &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
> > > > > > -   debugfs_create_file("status", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> > > > > > -                       &vgpu_status_fops);
> > > > > > +   debugfs_create_file_unsafe("status", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> > > > > > +                              &vgpu_status_fops);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  /**
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to