On 2/17/2023 5:32 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:15:59PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 2/17/2023 4:43 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

SKL/derivatives have DDI E but no AUX E, so we need to pick
another aux ch as the platform default. DDI E is more or less
the other half of DDI A, so we pick AUX A.

In all other cases we should have a corresponding aux ch for
each DDI.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
index 57eb3ff187fa..96967e21c94c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
@@ -739,10 +739,20 @@ void intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        cpu_latency_qos_add_request(&intel_dp->pm_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
   }
+static enum aux_ch default_aux_ch(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
+{
+       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
+
+       /* SKL has DDI E but no AUX E */
+       if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 9 && encoder->port == PORT_E)
+               return AUX_CH_A;
+
I guess we might need to fix intel_dp_aux_init also. Wont we have
dig_port->aux_ch and intel_dp->aux_ch pointing to different things?
There is no intel_dp->aux_ch.

For example for SKL and DDI E, intel_dp->aux.name will be derived from
dig_port->aux_ch i.e. AUX_CH_A but intel_dp->aux_ctl/data reg will still
point to DP_AUX_CH_CTL/DATA_E.

Am I missing something?
Everything is based on dig_port->aux_ch.

Yeah my bad. I think I misread and got confused. We indeed are using dig_port->aux_ch, for getting aux_ctl/data reg.

I couldnt get the exact bspec mention for SKL not having AUX E, but SKL Display connection Bspec:4217 throws some light, if I am not fully off.

Is this applicable to Canonlake too  (Bspec:14004) from Display connection it does seem to have DDI E but no DP_AUX E?


Regards,

Ankit


Regards,

Ankit


+       return (enum aux_ch)encoder->port;
+}
+
   enum aux_ch intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
   {
        struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
-       enum port port = encoder->port;
        enum aux_ch aux_ch;
aux_ch = intel_bios_dp_aux_ch(encoder->devdata);
@@ -753,7 +763,7 @@ enum aux_ch intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
                return aux_ch;
        }
- aux_ch = (enum aux_ch)port;
+       aux_ch = default_aux_ch(encoder);
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
                    "[ENCODER:%d:%s] using AUX %c (platform default)\n",

Reply via email to