On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:58:48 -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
Hi Umesh, couple of nits below.
> Some of the newer OA formats are not powers of 2. For those formats,
> adjust the hw_tail accordingly when checking for new reports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.rama...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index 9715b964aa1e..d3a1892c93be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct
> i915_perf_stream *stream)
> bool pollin;
> u32 hw_tail;
> u64 now;
> + u32 partial_report_size;
>
> /* We have to consider the (unlikely) possibility that read() errors
> * could result in an OA buffer reset which might reset the head and
> @@ -551,10 +552,16 @@ static bool oa_buffer_check_unlocked(struct
> i915_perf_stream *stream)
>
> hw_tail = stream->perf->ops.oa_hw_tail_read(stream);
>
> - /* The tail pointer increases in 64 byte increments,
> - * not in report_size steps...
> + /* The tail pointer increases in 64 byte increments, whereas report
> + * sizes need not be integral multiples or 64 or powers of 2.
s/or/of/ ---------------------------------------^
Also I think report sizes can only be multiples of 64, the ones we have
seen till now definitely are. Also the lower 6 bits of tail pointer are 0.
> + * Compute potentially partially landed report in the OA buffer
> */
> - hw_tail &= ~(report_size - 1);
> + partial_report_size = OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, stream->oa_buffer.tail);
> + partial_report_size %= report_size;
> +
> + /* Subtract partial amount off the tail */
> + hw_tail = gtt_offset + ((hw_tail - partial_report_size) &
> + (stream->oa_buffer.vma->size - 1));
Couple of questions here because OA_TAKEN uses OA_BUFFER_SIZE and the above
expression uses stream->oa_buffer.vma->size:
1. Is 'OA_BUFFER_SIZE == stream->oa_buffer.vma->size'? We seem to be using
the two interchaneably in the code.
2. If yes, can we add an assert about this in alloc_oa_buffer?
3. Can the above expression be changed to:
hw_tail = gtt_offset + OA_TAKEN(hw_tail, partial_report_size);
It would be good to use the same construct if possible. Maybe we can even
change OA_TAKEN to something like:
#define OA_TAKEN(tail, head) ((tail - head) & (stream->oa_buffer.vma->size -
1))
>
> now = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
>
> @@ -677,6 +684,8 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream
> *stream,
> {
> int report_size = stream->oa_buffer.format->size;
> struct drm_i915_perf_record_header header;
> + int report_size_partial;
> + u8 *oa_buf_end;
>
> header.type = DRM_I915_PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE;
> header.pad = 0;
> @@ -690,8 +699,21 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream
> *stream,
> return -EFAULT;
> buf += sizeof(header);
>
> - if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size))
> + oa_buf_end = stream->oa_buffer.vaddr +
> + stream->oa_buffer.vma->size;
> + report_size_partial = oa_buf_end - report;
> +
> + if (report_size_partial < report_size) {
> + if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size_partial))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + buf += report_size_partial;
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(buf, stream->oa_buffer.vaddr,
> + report_size - report_size_partial))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + } else if (copy_to_user(buf, report, report_size)) {
> return -EFAULT;
> + }
>
> (*offset) += header.size;
>
> @@ -759,8 +781,8 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream
> *stream,
> * all a power of two).
> */
> if (drm_WARN_ONCE(&uncore->i915->drm,
> - head > OA_BUFFER_SIZE || head % report_size ||
> - tail > OA_BUFFER_SIZE || tail % report_size,
> + head > OA_BUFFER_SIZE ||
> + tail > OA_BUFFER_SIZE,
The comment above the if () also needs to be fixed.
Also, does it make sense to have 'head % 64 || tail % 64' checks above? As
I was saying above head and tail will be 64 byte aligned.
> "Inconsistent OA buffer pointers: head = %u, tail =
> %u\n",
> head, tail))
> return -EIO;
> @@ -774,22 +796,6 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct
> i915_perf_stream *stream,
> u32 ctx_id;
> u64 reason;
>
> - /*
> - * All the report sizes factor neatly into the buffer
> - * size so we never expect to see a report split
> - * between the beginning and end of the buffer.
> - *
> - * Given the initial alignment check a misalignment
> - * here would imply a driver bug that would result
> - * in an overrun.
> - */
> - if (drm_WARN_ON(&uncore->i915->drm,
> - (OA_BUFFER_SIZE - head) < report_size)) {
> - drm_err(&uncore->i915->drm,
> - "Spurious OA head ptr: non-integral report
> offset\n");
> - break;
> - }
> -
> /*
> * The reason field includes flags identifying what
> * triggered this specific report (mostly timer
> --
> 2.36.1
>
