>Please use the symbolic constants in i915_reg.h, we can reuse the ones below 
>GEN6_PMIER. Also Chris had some comment to move this code around, but I didn't 
>really understand what he wants. Chris, can you please clarify?

Hi Chris,

Can you please clarify on this? 

Thanks
Deepak

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:52 PM
To: S, Deepak
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Chris Wilson
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: Disable/Enable PM Intrrupts 
based on the current freq.

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 07:31:08PM +0530, deepa...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
> 
> When current delay is already at max delay, Let's disable the PM UP 
> THRESHOLD INTRRUPTS, so that we will not get further interrupts until 
> current delay is less than max delay, Also request for the PM DOWN 
> THRESHOLD INTRRUPTS to indicate the decrease in clock freq. and 
> viceversa for PM DOWN THRESHOLD INTRRUPTS.
> 
> v2: Use bool variables (Daniel)
> 
> v3: Fix Interrupt masking bit (Deepak)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 +++  
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--  
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index cc8afff..d49e674 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -943,6 +943,9 @@ struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt {
>       u8 rp0_delay;
>       u8 hw_max;
>  
> +     bool rp_up_masked;
> +     bool rp_down_masked;
> +
>       int last_adj;
>       enum { LOW_POWER, BETWEEN, HIGH_POWER } power;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 1d44c79..e87d47a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -988,7 +988,20 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
>                       adj *= 2;
>               else
>                       adj = 1;
> -             new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay + adj;
> +
> +             if (dev_priv->rps.cur_delay >= dev_priv->rps.max_delay) {
> +                     I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK,
> +                                     I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK) | 1 << 5);

Please use the symbolic constants in i915_reg.h, we can reuse the ones below 
GEN6_PMIER. Also Chris had some comment to move this code around, but I didn't 
really understand what he wants. Chris, can you please clarify?

Thanks, Daniel

> +                     dev_priv->rps.rp_up_masked = true;
> +                     new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay;
> +             } else
> +                     new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay + adj;
> +
> +             if (dev_priv->rps.rp_down_masked) {
> +                     I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK,
> +                                     I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK) & ~(1 << 4));
> +                     dev_priv->rps.rp_down_masked = false;
> +             }
>  
>               /*
>                * For better performance, jump directly @@ -1007,7 +1020,21 @@ 
> static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work)
>                       adj *= 2;
>               else
>                       adj = -1;
> -             new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay + adj;
> +
> +             if (dev_priv->rps.cur_delay <= dev_priv->rps.min_delay) {
> +                     I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK,
> +                                     I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK) | 1 << 4);
> +                     dev_priv->rps.rp_down_masked = true;
> +                     new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay;
> +             } else
> +                     new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay + adj;
> +
> +             if (dev_priv->rps.rp_up_masked) {
> +                     I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK,
> +                                     I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK) & ~(1 << 5));
> +                     dev_priv->rps.rp_up_masked = false;
> +             }
> +
>       } else { /* unknown event */
>               new_delay = dev_priv->rps.cur_delay;
>       }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 469170c..9c950e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3628,6 +3628,9 @@ static void valleyview_enable_rps(struct drm_device 
> *dev)
>                        vlv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay),
>                        dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay);
>  
> +     dev_priv->rps.rp_up_masked = false;
> +     dev_priv->rps.rp_down_masked = false;
> +
>       valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, dev_priv->rps.rpe_delay);
>  
>       gen6_enable_rps_interrupts(dev);
> --
> 1.8.4.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to